FENQ

The information that can be confirmed so far is:

1. Fu Xiaotian’s economic strength is unusually strong, far exceeding the consumption level that her work can bring. Therefore, if she was not born in a super-rich family, then she has a national power to pay for her and is a long-term training target:

This is manifested in the fact that according to Cambridge University’s own description, Fu named the garden in 2016 because she made a series of generous donations to Churchill College, where she studied for her master’s degree (Figure 1);

Fu’s Weibo posted a lot of information about her life, such as living in a large mansion in LA (picture 2), taking a private jet, her trip to interview Qin Gang on 3/20 when she flew from LA to DC last year, and this year 4/11 with her son to fly to the “front”. According to the analysis of our group of friends, “it is a private jet, possibly Gulf Stream, a private jet worth tens of millions of dollars.” airplane”.

But there are a few doubts that show that the probability of her being the daughter of a prominent family is not high. In those years, children from families with backgrounds in Chongqing all went to No. 1 and No. 3 Middle Schools in Chongqing without exception! But she is not; she directly posted photos of her parents on Weibo, which looks like an ordinary family (Figure 9), and if there is a background, she would not directly post a frontal photo. Therefore, her economic strength, which is incomparable to a country, is more likely to be the latter, which comes from the support of the organization.

2. Fu Meimei posted Weibo to her child’s father on March 19, China time last year to celebrate his birthday, while Qin Gang was born on March 19, 1966 (Figure 4-5). Qin Gang’s Twitter avatar uses a portrait taken by Fu Meimei when he was interviewed by DC last year (Figure 6-7). This is the only clue that is the closest to proving the rumors among all the information on the Internet.

3. Fu posted all kinds of information in a high-profile Weibo but did not disclose the child’s father. It is basically certain that this is an illegitimate child (Figure 8). According to the time when the child was 100 days announced by himself (Figure 9), his son Er-Kin was born on November 24, 22. If it was a normal full-term pregnancy, it would be between January and February of that year.

4. Qin Gang’s “disappearance” was asked by the British Financial Times FT reporter to the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and he only got a perfunctory answer in a very official style. (Video 1)

(For other supplementary content and discussions, please refer to the message area of ​​yesterday’s Telegram post.)