Original link: https://onojyun.com/2022/08/10/6528/
△ 222｜Being smarter than hooligans is worse than pretending to be stupid
The day before yesterday, there was a power outage at home, and I only reacted suddenly today. I wonder if the freezer storage cabinet at home will not resume work after the call. But on second thought, if a freezer that needs to work at any time cannot be automatically activated after the call is restored, then the logic of this setting is too fucked up. I believe that this “automatic function” was first added to the operation logic of the refrigerator product, which itself also took this matter into consideration.
According to the logical thinking of normal people, it is considered a “must” design, forming a consensus and standard in the industry. Anyone who dares to develop a freezer refrigerator that requires people to manually turn on the switch after a power outage is likely to be scolded to death. Of course, this design is not what the law stipulates that freezer and refrigerator manufacturers must do, so it is inevitable to encounter manufacturers who want to challenge the bottom line of the public. In turn, these developers can also lick their faces. Saying that he is doing a design that “subverts the industry” is about to lead a wave of industry trends.
Speaking of such a face-licking company, you probably have several matching lists in your heart. I don’t know where they got the courage to do a function “optimization” that was not thought of by the human brain. In fact, it is more like a bug in the product logic, but they can lick their faces and say that they are subverting Traditional industries are leading a new trend.
We should never underestimate the product logic and the lower limit of IQ of domestic car manufacturers. They dare to design a large sunroof above your head without a heat avoidance system, and tomorrow they will “innovate” a perfect combination of seat and toilet for you. , to solve the problem of long-distance driving to the toilet. Although the pain points solved by the 360º panoramic sunroof and toilet seat are very precise, they are also used to install ?.
——The circle of friends I posted on the domestic electric car with the domestic panoramic sunroof exposed to the sun
Of course, it needs to be emphasized that the things we discuss here are not aimed at any specific company. If there is an excessive interpretation, it is your problem. Because you first define domestic companies as “problematic”, it can be applied to me. In the “formula” of , you are responsible for all the associations and judgments.
Because of the setting of the freezer to automatically turn on after power failure, I suddenly remembered an interesting situation, but I haven’t found the “professional term” for this theory for a while. To put it simply, a software manufacturer claims to have developed a “privacy protection” software, but in order to compare the power of this “privacy protection”, he must find a comparable product. If it is a similar product in the benchmarking industry, it is somewhat “peers are enemies”. So they benchmarked their past products, but because this “privacy protection” is too powerful, it even exceeds the original industry standard (or there is no concept of privacy protection in the past industry standards), if they benchmark their past products product, does that mean that it is publicly acknowledged that in fact the entire industry did not have the “privacy protection” methods they claimed in the past?
If a representative of an industry really takes the lead in developing this so-called “privacy protection”, it is really challenging the bottom line of the entire industry and subverting a certain self-deceiving consensus formed by the entire industry for a long time.
In another case, if the developer is not an oligarch in the industry, but a new product. From the very beginning, it has been benchmarking against the original industry standards, adding the true “privacy protection” to its research and development products. It claims that although it has not made a strong benchmarking, it makes people wonder if it is their own Previously used products did not adopt a real sense of privacy protection. If such a situation is formed, I think you can also guess what the outcome will be-either the developer will be boycotted and expelled by the oligarchs in the industry, or it will be purchased by one or several oligarchs, so that this “” Developers with a little conscience have to make compromises that are “beneficial to the rules of the entire industry” for the sake of money.
In fact, this set of rules is the logic and theory of the “rogue” itself. I didn’t expect that it would make sense for people to use it on the “rogue”:
“We have developed a product that protects privacy even more!” “That means your previous products didn’t protect privacy at all?”
“We just use the privacy of users as a way to exchange convenience, and we do not want to invade the privacy of users.” .”
“Look, we have developed the world’s first widest panoramic sunroof.” “But it doesn’t block the sun at all, it’s too hot.” “No, the sun, not the panoramic sunroof, is the cause of the heat inside the car. And we also provide consumers with such a beautiful view.”
“Rogues” are not unintelligent. I never imagined that these rogues’ logic would definitely attract backlash, but rather than being smarter than rogues, it’s better to think about whether you have rogues who will act stupid. If all the “rogues” turn a blind eye to the privacy protection policy and just turn it into a standard clause in the “User Privacy Agreement”, then the consequence of their choice to act stupid together is to treat users with a lot of rogue logic. “Privacy Data”. Unless, this group of “rogues” discuss and decide together, it is time to protect user privacy – of course, this time is not smart, but who they are more conscientious than.
Of course, this rogue logic is finally handed back to the user: because many people don’t care about their privacy, and even sacrifice their privacy in exchange for convenience , so “rogues” should not stop people from being cheap, and they don’t need to worry about it. user privacy.
You see, the root of the problem has been found, because the users themselves are too cheap.
This article is reproduced from: https://onojyun.com/2022/08/10/6528/
This site is for inclusion only, and the copyright belongs to the original author.