Original link: https://onojyun.com/2022/08/11/6535/
△ 223｜Diode Utilization Rule
I was going to blow up a “shithole” last night, but unfortunately it hasn’t caused much ripples yet.
The premise is that a friend has been pestering me for several days, and wants me to help him analyze the Sogou input method of the Windows version and the macOS version. From a legal point of view, will there be any difference in the privacy policy level? He deduced the conclusion that he wanted to hear most in his heart: “The macOS version of Sogou input method has better privacy protection”. In fact, I don’t really like to look at the format clauses, because these people who set privacy clauses are always a lot of nonsense, but the macOS version of the privacy policy of the few Sogou input methods is clean and neat. After the analysis, there is a material that can “explode the cesspool”.
The so-called “dung pit” is to post some obviously controversial and subversive cognition or other content that is different from most people’s cognition to social platforms, which leads to a debate about “right and wrong” – — but the question itself is not whether there is right or wrong in this matter, because these events themselves should not be discussed in terms of right and wrong. In this process, many people who did not read the content at all, but only saw the key words and fought back. Generally, a lot of disparaging tones refer to them as “maggots” , but I think it’s a bit too insulting, so I use “diodes” here. Others don’t read the content at all, they just give priority to what the comments are discussing. Once they have the same views as themselves, they will automatically team up to support and support them, and oppose other voices with different views. And attacks— generally such “exploding cesspits” in the end, people no longer discuss the original topic, but rise to insults and personal attacks between different groups. Of course, this is the “dung pit” in the most “ideal state” situation. It can be bombed to such a perfect level, and I have only experienced a few scenes in my life.
There are many situations that irritate the “diode”, but it is nothing more than the following fixed logic:
- Your opinion is different from mine, so your opinion is wrong;
- A is wrong, you did not say that A is wrong, so your point of view is also wrong;
- A is wrong. Although you said that A has wrong elements, you also mentioned that A has right parts, so you are washing the ground for A, and deducing all your opinions will only be wrong;
- A is wrong, and B is wrong to a certain extent, but you only mentioned A’s problem without mentioning B’s problem, so your point of view is actually favoring B’s mistake, and it is also wrong to reverse all your opinions. ;
- A is right, if you think there is a problem with A, then first reflect on whether it is your own problem ;
- A is right. If you think that B is also right, and you do not mention that A is right, then your behavior has a certain behavior of pulling and stepping , so according to the conclusion that A is right, it can be deduced that you and you support it. B is wrong;
- A and B are different, if you question A and affirm B, then they will prove that B is wrong, so infer A is right;
To put it simply, what the “diodes” hold on to is a principle of “right and wrong” that overrides all rules. They distinguish most of the rules of the world between “right” and “wrong”. But occasionally there are many “gray areas”, but they are often because of their own biases in the process of judging right and wrong and the need for adjustment without overturning their own perceptions. For example, if they hold the view of absolute right and wrong, and what they think is right is finally found to be wrong, then they will presume a gray area and use “Even if it is wrong, it is still right. more” to optimize their cognition.
In the past, I would instinctively stay away from such people, because reasoning is completely unworkable, and you even feel that when you work with them, you can’t even have your own independent cognition. After all, their public cognition already represents a sense of “truth”. For example, I used to write a logic formula for programmers with easy-to-understand logic and tell them that this thing is the algorithm that we want to achieve a certain function. But after all, I am not a programmer, and my position in the company is not a programmer, so they will preferentially exclude my views. The logic behind this isn’t too problematic at first glance: you’re not a programmer, so you can’t do what a programmer does, so what you suggest to a programmer is theoretically infeasible.
But in the end, when the algorithm was presented, the calculation method I proposed at the beginning was the same as the logic that was finally returned through the code, but I used it more like a vernacular written by an “idiot” to them. Of course, just because of this vernacular language is enough for them to oppose and determine what is right and wrong. But I also admit this, no matter how clear the calculation rules are in my mind, as long as there is no way to express them in “human” words, then I am still an “idiot”.
In the past two years, there have been some changes in concept – instead of instinctively hiding, it is better to use it rationally. In the adult world, this is commonplace, but for “diodes”, the word “exploit” itself carries a very strong sense of right and wrong because it is full of derogatory connotations and the worst possible extension, so they Of course, I don’t like being “used” myself. But the rules of the game are this: if you can’t beat them, join them, and if you can’t join them, use them.
Through so many years of practical experience in “destruction pits”, I can summarize some of the more commonly used methods:
- Provoking internal conflicts is the fastest way to disintegrate the internal. “Diodes”, while upholding right and wrong views, cannot quickly distinguish whether other people’s views have their own desirable parts, so they will preferentially exclude those views that are “different from their own views”. For example, they think tomatoes are sour, but at this time one person stands up and says that tomatoes are red, and they also object to this view because he does not explicitly support the view that tomatoes are sour. Since there is no way to connect and intersect between opinions and opinions when the public is angry, that is to say, the “diode” groups that support different opinions form a relatively isolated and independent situation. It is also the easiest to provoke alienation at this time.
- Cognitions form an intersection, but opinions are only right and wrong. With the passage of time, some “diodes” that are not so firm will start to sway from side to side. Although they have not given up their correct cognition, they will gradually realize that the views of others are also worth learning and affirming. But due to the rabble grouping together, they did not dare to stand up for the first time and affirm other people’s views. Because for “diodes”, the rules of the world are only right and wrong. If their own views are right, then others must be wrong. If it involves accepting other people’s views, then they must subvert the right from the root. The Supreme Code of Wrong. At this time, it is necessary to reinterpret the thinking of “diode”: their views are right, but it does not prove that their views are right. Because what we think is right, their views are always biased. Use this method to continue to strengthen the camp of right and wrong, so as to prevent more people from defecting after they are clear-headed.
- The enemy of the enemy is the friend. There are also many Love & Peace persuasionists in Diode once opinions conflict. Once the ratio of persuaders exceeds that of right and wrong advocates, the mob will quickly disintegrate. And once there is a situation where one of the two sides of the show has died in advance, it means that the battle of right and wrong views has entered the stage of winning and losing. The game of right and wrong is always about who can win to the end. If there is a lot of Love & Peace in the team, you need to incite them to find those “enemies” who have been hurt by their opponents, use Love & Peace to influence them, and let the enemies enemies become friends, and thus out-compete each other in battle. If the affected people are also a “diode” group, then they will feel warm because of the group, so as to find a subtle “fit” between the right and wrong views of the two, form a larger point of view, and naturally solve more Originally, the use of right and wrong viewpoints will cause internal contradictions to be bugs.
- Often fried in the pit, how can you not stick to shit. Impersonating a “diode” is easy, as long as you have a deep understanding of the ways to provoke a “diode”. But among them for a long time, it is inevitable that there will be a situation where a lie told a thousand times is the truth. Therefore, to maintain a clear cognition, even though it is disguised as a diode, independent thinking still needs to be retained, think more about why, and learn to appreciate and dismantle those sounds that are different from the cognition of diodes. But it is inevitable that shit will blow up on yourself. At this time, you must learn to sell miserably, provoke personal attacks from the other party, and put yourself in a “weak” situation. Not only can you gain an absolute moral advantage, but you can also borrow This is the dawn of victory for the “Diode” team that he is in.
Of course, too much shit blocks the toilet, and it is inevitable that someone will press the flush button, and the hot search square that was originally discussed with blood may be zeroed in an instant, but it doesn’t matter – social media is the cesspool of The shit is gone, but the smell lingers for a long time.
This article is reproduced from: https://onojyun.com/2022/08/11/6535/
This site is for inclusion only, and the copyright belongs to the original author.