Original link: https://onojyun.com/2022/08/26/6686/
△ 238｜Attribution Game
I specifically went to see if there was such a “game” series in the last round of 500-day writing, except for the “Hunter” who used stream of consciousness as the writing style and created his inner world due to subtle changes in the progress of 500-day writing. Game”, there is no longer any content on this topic. Therefore, it can be announced that the “Game” series is a module that begins with “inexplicable” interspersed in the new round of 500-day writing.
I wrote a lot of “games” before, adhering to the idea that “the more serious the title is, the more serious the views are”, and today’s “Attribution Game” is the same. Attribution is one of the foundations of social psychology, which means that the observer infers the cause and causality of the behavior from the behavior of others. This is what I love to do, infer a person’s inner world from his behavior, or imitate a person’s inner world to describe some superficial behavior – in short, the attribution game for me is In a game that is half the story, I see the phenomenon that people will not believe the essence, or everyone knows what the essence is, but I just say some irrelevant appearances.
I don’t know if you ever had a “wrong question set” when you were a student. I will also prepare a so-called set of wrong questions for the wrong questions. At the beginning, I will honestly write the questions that I make every day on it. But generally speaking, I can’t last for a week. On the one hand, my grades are not very good, and it is inevitable that there are “many” wrong questions, which is too troublesome to sort out; pleasure. For this reason, I have also been scolded by the subject teachers of various subjects, saying that I have a bad attitude, and I resigned myself to the top ten teams in the class. The function of the set of wrong questions is to let me know clearly Where your own mistakes are easy to come from, so as to avoid losing points. I immediately asked the teacher: Will the questions you have given be given again as they are? It is also because of this rhetorical question that I was considered to have a “bad attitude”.
Of course, the “attribution game” of the set of wrong questions is not about learning to draw inferences from the wrong questions. It is as if this time the wrong questions were reverently copied into the notebook, and the next time I encounter similar problems, I won’t do it again. wrong. And the “attribution game” of the wrong question set lies in its “consensus and specificity” – every good student has a wrong question set that is made by invoking each other, so they form a consensus in a sense , that is, only students who know how to use the wrong question set well are good students, and I am a student who does not understand the meaning of the wrong question set at all. Because I cannot form a unified consensus with them, I naturally become their eyes. “bad students”.
Likewise, another “attribution game” happened. I actually didn’t like geography at first, but since I don’t like science and English classes even more, I usually use these two classes to “research” why I don’t like geography and whether I can save my messy geography grades . In this process, I also discovered the joy of geography, and found “rules” from it. I memorized the world’s rivers, lakes, and mountains by memorizing keywords and graphic memory, and then combined with the model diagrams of monsoons and ocean currents. , I combined the whole world’s climate system, agriculture and animal husbandry economy, human landscape, etc., so that my geography score soared to the first place in the class, and was praised by the geography teacher and praised in the class. I am a student who is very capable of summarizing and inductive learning. Of course, my method of learning geography is not the “wrong question set model” that everyone recognizes. In the “attribution game”, I still lost to “consensus and particularity”, because everyone’s consensus It is too low. Except for me, other good students in the whole class have not used this method, so through attribution analysis, my method is just “opportunistic”.
Well, let’s get rid of these social psychology theories now, whether it’s correct or not, there’s no attribution effect, will these good students think I’m the same as them? Will they genuinely learn from me because of the praise of the geography teacher? At this time, people have found a theoretical basis to categorically conclude that the fundamental beginning and end of a thing is a very boring thing in itself – just like that set of wrong questions, the wrong questions that were copied will obviously not appear again in the book. In exams, but it is claimed that its function is to make people find ways to avoid mistakes from wrong patterns – but they fall into the same man or woman’s pit more than twice in adulthood, and also To climb out of the pit, pat the scum and excrement on his body, and cry out “I still love you”.
As a result, people don’t necessarily have a collection of wrong topics about love, marriage, and incest. The wrong ones are still wrong. If they shouldn’t be wrong, they even create opportunities to make mistakes and make mistakes that shouldn’t be made. I have seen many emotion experts who earnestly “attribute” other people’s feelings. They have used various theoretical disciplines in order to find the “wrong” from an emotional tragedy that has occurred, but often such feelings Counseling doesn’t work either, because the person who is supposed to be at fault is still going to make mistakes. It’s like a fate, even if the fortune-telling master told him that he couldn’t play with other people’s feelings this year, and he also invited the magic and elixir from the master. Whether the fate will come or not depends on the size of his encounter – if it is small, it may be that he fell off the chair when he was too excited while watching porn, and broke his life; if it is big, he still has to find a woman The peach blossom calamity, such as enlarging a certain woman’s belly, turned out that the other party was still a married woman, divorced her husband and had to keep up with him, and the result was that the child she gave birth was not the unexpected pregnancy that she had made at the time.
Written here, smart people should find that I have stolen the concept. I made an analogy with the emotional life of the last test paper of the wrong question set, which can only get the score of the first sub-question. Mathematical problems will at least have various methodologies, and as long as you are familiar with these methodologies, you can find an ingenious rule for these topics; but emotional life is complicated, and human nature is different, and the stories to be experienced in it will not Repeat – but you don’t find it, people prefer to do “error sets” for those complicated math problems, or do all kinds of “error analysis” about their own and other people’s emotional life?
As a digression at the end, I like Bernard Weiner’s attribution theory, because he was the first scholar to include the concept of “luck” in attribution. , will also depend on his luck at the time. This thing that is completely uncertain or even impossible to be calculated by a calculation formula has become the most important indicator used by modern people to attribute themselves: I can only say that I am unlucky when I meet a scumbag.
other games”
Anonymous Game | Minesweeper Game | Survival Game | Sand Pile Game | Love Game | Building Block Game | Witch Hunting Game |
This article is reproduced from: https://onojyun.com/2022/08/26/6686/
This site is for inclusion only, and the copyright belongs to the original author.