Original link: https://onojyun.com/2022/05/26/6102/
△ 146｜Camera
Although Shanghai has not yet lifted the blockade, some people can go out for a walk while they have a temporary “release permit”. At this time, in the heart of “them” as managers, there is an unwritten rule, but everyone is sticking to the rules – staring at those who go out with cameras.
I don’t need to mention the reasons for this, you and I can say a lot, some are not malicious, non-malicious, interesting and boring, cryptic and groundless. In short, residents who have a “ventilation certificate” can go out, but if you bring a camera or hold a mobile phone to take pictures anywhere at any time, you will be targeted by those people. Although they can’t do anything, the key is They can still point out your problem with reason and reason, and when necessary, they will submit the person’s information to avoid him causing unnecessary trouble.
So what exactly are they afraid of, no one knows, but there is indeed something that will make them afraid, let them prove it, but they can’t find any way to prove it.
I should have told this story, but it should not be in the “△” of daily writing.
I once went to Yunyun Restaurant with my wife to have French food. Because it was a trial operation, it was still an invitation-only model at that time. Because of the rare opportunity and the need for the intervention of marketing means, it is inevitable that there will be customers who take photos everywhere with cameras and go back to make Xiaohongshu. I originally thought that the woman was just photographing the food in front of her, or going to the open kitchen to photograph the chef. Unexpectedly, she started taking her camera in the cloud restaurant and started shooting everywhere, and finally filmed us without our permission.
I stopped her immediately, and I asked her if she was a staff member here and if she wanted to prepare materials for the restaurant’s trial opening. She said no, just regular guests. Then I told her that her behavior of shooting from someone else’s point of view without their permission was very rude, and she immediately explained that she just borrowed a wine glass on our table and used it as a set to shoot. And I think that since she has turned the camera towards someone else, whether she uses depth of field or not, she should get permission from others.
Then the staff came forward and solved the embarrassment. I told the staff, since you want to work hard towards the Michelin restaurant, should you avoid these situations that will cause embarrassment to customers in terms of service? The thing is that the mistresses come to eat together, will I be willing to be photographed. This conclusion amused the waiter and ourselves, and this is the end of the story. It’s just that the woman had to come over with a camera to prove to me that she really deleted the photos, but I refused because I didn’t want to continue chatting with unqualified people.
She is also a person with a camera, but the degree of uncontrollability is not as good as the person who took pictures in the empty streets in Shanghai during the epidemic – after all, no matter how stupid the former is, the most exaggerated is the Internet celebrity. In the middle of the dining room, I took off half of my dress, I was slightly drunk, and half of my breasts were leaking. Enke’s celebrity photo. But for the latter, although the world seen through the lenses of those people is all the Bund, the information that everyone can read is different. The person who took the photo may just lament that the bustling Bund in the past has finally faded away. People can calm down and take a look at the beautiful scenery here; and people who see this photo online will feel that the epidemic in Shanghai has made the scenery of the Bund so cold; but they will think more – are you? If you want to satirize something in this way, do you want to borrow the desertedness of Shanghai to play off the topic…
There is another person who caused a sensation with a camera and was even more uncontrollable than taking pictures on the empty streets of Shanghai. A few days ago, a friend mentioned it on the blog, and that is Edison Chen. To be honest, since the pornographic incident broke out, I don’t think Edison Chen is wrong. He’s right doesn’t mean “those women who have an affair with him are wrong”, let’s not rush to discuss this issue with such a diode thinking.
Edison Chen, who took the camera and left his story with the female star, did nothing wrong. After all, it was his private life. He didn’t break the law in the first place. The communicator is the one who breaks the law. As for morality, there is nothing to say. If it is now that Edison Chen was shot for ten minutes, this group of people may not feel that it is enough. Of course, when looking at the photos, they are already too addicted, and then seeing him being publicly executed, it is another Another addiction.
This is the private life of a star, and the female star who accepts the relationship with him is also their private life. The thing recorded by the camera was not originally used for “circulation” at all, right? In the end, a group of moral guards, criticizing Chen and scolding Zhang, were not asking for a full set of photos in private.
Today, I will tell you three stories about “camera”. To sum up, they are:
When a fool holds a camera, it is not necessarily a fool to take pictures; when a smart person holds a camera, there are also fools among the people watching; when a smart person takes pictures for a smart person, the fool is afraid and wonders if the smart person said something about them. I don’t understand; stupid people take pictures for smart people to see, but the smart people don’t know how to look, and the stupid thinks that they are stupid people who don’t understand; the most powerful thing is that smart people take pictures for stupid people, knowing that stupid people can’t understand, But they want to make them feel that they understand and become wise.
This article has a total of 12 sensitive words in the simplified Chinese environment.
This article is reproduced from: https://onojyun.com/2022/05/26/6102/
This site is for inclusion only, and the copyright belongs to the original author.