Original link: https://blog.est.im/2022/stderr-06
Recently, real estate has become popular again due to policy reasons. Many people have headaches when they talk about houses. They say that this house is a bubble, and it will bring disaster to the country and the people. Then I have a nonsense reason for today’s politics. The pattern is opened, and we must realize democracy and socialism , To reach the paradise on earth, please buy a house vigorously.
On buying a house
First, let’s talk about a concept with etymology, who has a house == Bourgeois. Discussing process :
bourgeoisie comes from French bourgeois; as Italian, which is closely related to French, it corresponds to borghese; as Italian, which is closer to Latin derivation, naturally it can also find its corresponding word in Greek, and The Italian borghese is derived from the Greek πύργος, πύργος evolved from πόλη, the village borgo, and the bourgeois itself in Greek means the free man who owns a house in the center of the village. Bourgeois appeared in medieval Italy, when he lived in The inhabitants of the village began to become richer than those who lived in the surrounding countryside. As a result, they could gain relatively more power and influence, getting closer and closer to the ruling class and clergy, while gradually moving away from the commoners. This medieval bourgeois archetype was the mill owner, who was able to exert significant influence over the local economy quickly enough to express a veto over the ruler.
In the following century, the term bourgeois was more appropriate to refer to the original bankers, as well as those engaged in emerging activities such as trade and finance. In the 11th century, burgeis in French referred to the inhabitants of medieval towns (bourgs) who had escaped feudal jurisdiction and acquired legal rights. Before the 19th century, the term mostly referred to a broad population below the nobility and above the serf and proletariat.
So what is a bourgeoisie? In the countryside, it is people who own a house next to the most prosperous market in the town; in the city, it is a person who owns a house near the CBD business district.
In the prophecy system of the prophet Ma, which was later familiar to the Chinese, in addition to the spatial meaning of real estate, Bourgeois also had a temporal meaning:
Bourgeois is a person who can live a better life even on a flat bed with asset income.
Of course, in Europe at that time, this “asset” could also refer to assets such as factories and plantations, but today, real estate is more valuable. But most importantly, they were less constrained by feudal lords and clergy, and had some economic self-sustainability.
What does it mean to own a flat
First of all, Bourgeois means quitting production and having a steady stream of passive income. Bourgeois began to support the development of science, technology and literature and art. If you carefully observe the Renaissance, Enlightenment and even the Industrial Revolution, you can find that the invention of these things has nothing to do with the poor masses. There are no relationships, and they are all for the purpose of realizing asset appreciation. Da Vinci Michelangelo’s artistic achievement is to draw a headshot for Bourgeois, Copernicus, Di Valley, and Kepler demonstrate the purity of faith for Bourgeois, and Watt’s improvement of the steam engine is for the owner Soho Manufactory to use to make metal art Items such as metal buttons, marcasite diamond imitations, etc. are supplied to British Bourgeois consumption. The older Greeks knew that there are 5 kinds of regular polyhedrons. This kind of knowledge is more of an entertainment method used by bourgeois who are out of production to show off their IQ superiority.
Only homeowners can overthrow feudal rule
Real estate belongs to private property, private property is secondary here, property is important, it is a physical existence, not a virtual pie, and it cannot generate electricity with love. Although the clergy is brainwashed every day, there is no old world without God, but the house can only be maintained with hard work, so Bourgeois has no guilt. Therefore, Bourgeois’ cognition and judgment of real material interests are far greater than his insistence on belief or loyalty to the lord. So the iconic event that broke the feudal rule later, the French Revolution, in the eyes of the prophet Ma, was the Bourgeois Revolution, also known as the bourgeois-democratic revolution. Bourgeois refused to accept anyone, and they simply took a step back and made do with each other. Democracy requires compromise.
And why did Bourgeois want to break the old system, revolution? There are many explanations in the textbook, such as Louis XVI losing a battle to increase taxes, Bourgeois needing political status, and so on. None of these explanations have a strong reason: Bourgeois to prevent the devaluation of his assets . So France soon changed in 3 years.
If you have a child, you will fight back
Recently I saw a theory that I am very impressed with, that is, “All the arguments are because there is no interested party on both sides, and they are all connected through the air.”
Facts have proved that reforms that are advanced and based on progressive ideology rather than real interests will ultimately end up being politicized-because no matter who’s point of view this matter is done, there will be no money to sell to each other. On one side, you can only fight for reasons, which will become the focus of the struggle between political parties. This was the case with Roe v. Wade, as was the affirmative-action policy for disadvantaged groups that Obama vigorously promoted during his presidency. However, it is very difficult to find a reform point that can liberate the productive forces and produce huge benefits and conform to ideology.
In this sense, I think that cycling “it’s my duty” is just a slogan. You only have one broken bike in your entire possession, and there are too many workarounds.
When you really have no way out in order to protect your family property, you will have the same passive enthusiasm for the revolution as the land revolution.
robbery
Prophet Ma prophesied a distant place where milk and honey flowed, but there were actually two other curses . That is to say, if proletarian believers want to reach heaven, they must first have property; they can become communist only after having property.
Translated into adult words, it means to buy a house. It makes sense now. For example, why is there such a fuss about closure and control in Shanghai? I feel that a large part of the reason is that there are too many people in Shanghai with decent housing and a lot of shit. Wouldn’t it be happier for renters in Beijing or other cities in the basement of Sangwowotou to be rewarded with a few extra pies from the sky. The disillusionment of Shanghainese may be due to the discovery of the true face of a religious state, which is greater than human rights
China has been a highly religious society since ancient times. The religious power is not only far greater than the royal power, but the royal power even has the nature of being subordinate to the religious power at some times. a civilized system in which social organization is completely organized around religion
Think the above statement is absurd? Please click on the link to watch https://www.zhihu.com/question/28864242/answer/2435378426
in conclusion
If Prophet Ma’s prediction is correct, then whether you support democracy or socialism, please buy a house, and encourage people around you to buy a house, especially civil servants and friends of cadres. Only when there is housing can there be a city, and when there is a city, there is self-government of residents, and when there is self-governance by residents, there is a cognitive enlightenment of property management rights and property rights, and there is the most basic civic and political heritage of de-education.
Oh yes, and don’t rent a house or split a house, renting a house and splitting a house will only turn you into a feudal vassal.
This article is reproduced from: https://blog.est.im/2022/stderr-06
This site is for inclusion only, and the copyright belongs to the original author.