Fliggy lashed out at Ctrip for plagiarizing articles

According to Singularity Finance, on January 12, Fliggy published an article on its official account “Dear @旅行旅行快乐新年”. Compared with special effects and other aspects, it pointed out that the repetition rate of the two articles was as high as 93%, and it was suspected that Ctrip’s strategy was plagiarized. Fliggy also replied to the message in the comment area, saying: I made three wrong words, and they all made the same mistakes. | Related reading (Tiger Sniff)

He Chen

This reminds me of the plagiarism incident of the Audi Xiaoman solar term advertisement that exploded last year. If you compare such things, you will find that the advertising company really has no talent who can write the copywriting of “Life Xiaoman”, so they took the risk to plagiarize. Then Ctrip is not People can write this strategy, I’m afraid it’s just laziness. Ctrip really wants to strengthen the company’s management, and the employees are speechless when they have fished to this level.

Next, I am afraid that Ctrip will also respond to this question, such as saying that its management is not strict, and some employees have been dismissed. In short, this matter may pass soon, and it will not be as huge as Xiaoman After all, without Liu Tianwang, without a big name like Audi, without an intermediary advertising company, this enthusiasm would not exist, and this drama would not be able to continue. And whether Fliggy will sue because of this, I don’t think so.

This article is reproduced from: https://www.fortunechina.com/jingxuan/25991.htm
This site is only for collection, and the copyright belongs to the original author.