forever your mother ?️ away

△ 132|Forever Your Mother ? Far

This article left a timing for publishing at 11:00 this morning, but it didn’t write a single word of the content. It’s past 10, and there’s a tension and vulgar drama to defuse the bomb before the countdown arrives.

When I wrote this topic yesterday, I planned to use it as “Add Your Mom” ? Oil” and “Forever Young, Forever Tears” . So a warm reminder at the very beginning is:

Please regard “always young, always tearful eyes” as a friend of adult life creed, please close this page when reading this sentence, lest the following content will cause you (physical and psychological) discomfort.

some warm reminders

The concept of “forever” is very vague, because he has no standard to speak of, so this sentence is easy to be overused. Especially at the emotional level, this should be the most commonly used word for swearing. Generally speaking, whether or not to say the oath of “we will always be together” has no effect on the relationship between two people, because this is not a contract clause. It has not violated its responsibility for breach of contract, so this sentence is an empty check, and the advance is patience and trust.

Another concept of “forever” is most likely to appear in various chicken soup literature, such as “forever young, always full of tears”, because there is no exact concept of time, so the word refers to a “constant state” . That’s the problem, so if I discuss with you whether “forever” is forever or not, it seems that you don’t understand the taste. What people should discuss in this sentence is what “youth” and “tears in your eyes” mean. what.

And the problem lies in the definition of these two words, because the definitions of internal and external are completely different. Those who take this sentence as a creed in life are always prone to falling into double standards. The “youth” of others means that you should maintain a positive attitude, while your own “youth” means that you are allowed to make mistakes that are only made because you are “young”; Tears filled my eyes” because I was moved by myself.

To be honest, I have seen many middle-aged people who are still having affairs in various ways. They often regard this sentence as a life creed. They do not think that their infidelity is a mistake, but a kind of “young”. The pursuit is not to restrain their inner impulses and passions. Of course, there is no logical relationship between the two, but there are some people who “stay young” who love cheating, take this sentence as a creed in life, rather than those who take this sentence as a creed, they are prone to derailment People – but, unfortunately, this group of people likes to argue with people with this kind of stupid logic.

The word “forever” has the bohemian romantic texture of French poetry to some extent, because no one can tell how far forever is, and it is because of this proposition of “proving the existence of the devil” that people are always puzzled. Loving and adoring. I have tried to analyze the magic of the word – “forever” should be a paradox, how we define “forever” because we know where the boundaries of “forever” are and define it more than time in general. long, but “forever” itself has no boundaries.

I raised this question when I was a child. In the “School of Foreign Affairs”, there is a sentence: “If you want to have a certificate, make this adoptive document. Keep it forever.” Things that may exist, change to the present, can the credentials established by people at that time still be found? Since it cannot be found, the sentence itself is contradictory.

But on the other hand, if the evidence can really be found in the present, but the two people who established the evidence have been around for a hundred years, the evidence will no longer be meaningful to them. Unless three conditions are met at the same time: 1. They have signed a contract about the next life; 2. They have an afterlife and retain the memory of their previous life; 3. The contract they signed can be preserved “forever”. Only when these three conditions exist, will “eternal preservation” be possible, otherwise all “eternal” will be agreed upon with the life and death of the parties involved.

So is it possible to say that the length of “forever” depends on the length of the person’s life?

“Husband, I will never leave you.” In the blink of an eye, the husband died and the wife remarried. Is this a violation of the “eternal vow”. In modern society, there are still a lot of people who will attack this wife, thinking that she has violated the “contract” between her and her husband. Since it is forever, you should keep your promise and be a widow for life. But if the protagonists of this story are replaced by themselves, they will excuse the definition of “forever”, and their own happiness is what the deceased people most want to see…

Therefore, “forever” depends on the person who has set the concept of “forever”. They decide how long “forever” is, whether it is the death of the other party, or whether the agreed thing is no longer possible, or there is no need for more investment. “Forever” is like a standard clause in a contractual relationship. Without it, it seems that the relationship between two people cannot be established, but these things are the settings of “Please read carefully and check to know”, and no one will read it. But there must be – if the two sides of the relationship don’t have such an agreement, it’s as if they can’t go forever. Just because it is a standard clause, other autonomy of will is higher than this clause, and “forever” is just a non-existent existence.

If you put it into the phrase “forever young, always with tears in your eyes”, “forever” is a state agreement, that is, to remain in a certain state that they think should be maintained. The phrase “forever young” sounds too much to make people think, the most direct is the continuation of lifespan, and the deeper level is that they have the power not to be responsible for their own emotions, as long as they feel uncomfortable, they can vent it, They don’t need to consider other people’s eyes – this is also youth; they have an undiminished libido and can have sex with different people, they call it young because they don’t need to take responsibility for their own impulses – this is also This kind of youth; they keep their minds active, define the world with likes and dislikes, and see each other in black and white. This is a kind of precious sincerity and purity – this is also a kind of youth.

But people will grow up eventually, not because your personality signature is changed to this sentence, you can stay young forever, you have the privilege to release your emotions at will, and you can find excuses for your irresponsibility reasons, or to maintain a black-and-white enthusiasm for looking at the world.

Some people will say that this is an expectation, an attitude towards life. So here comes the question, I didn’t say “right or wrong” from beginning to end, why do I have to think that I am using a negative attitude when evaluating “forever”? Should I review myself, whether I am still “forever young” and maintain that black-and-white cognition.

To be fair, I also say my life motto, so as to avoid me just blindly evaluating other people’s “forever” and appearing how noble I am.

Always pick things up, never give a shit.

This article is reproduced from: https://onojyun.com/2022/05/12/5510/
This site is for inclusion only, and the copyright belongs to the original author.

Leave a Comment