Original link: https://onojyun.com/2022/05/24/5751/
△ 144｜Indoctrination of Gaotai and the three vulgar customs
“Should literary breakthroughs be educated on a high platform?” This question was a debate competition I participated in when I was in high school. After all, it has to face many teachers and students, so there are some not-so-good examples. It is impossible to get the environment to talk about. Yes, but I think there are several questions similar to “Should literary breakthroughs be educated on a high platform”:
- Can eunuchs discuss sex?
- Should a couple cheat on each other?
- Should I only touch the eighteenth in the eighteenth touch?
Returning to the title itself, we must first understand a precondition. Who should define “Gaotai Enlightenment” and “Indecent vulgarity”?
Some time ago, a friend I met on Douban chatted with me, saying that he recently wrote a serialization of erotic novels on Taiwan’s erotic forum, which was well received. In my impression, he is actually a very “decent” critic. He used to attract many fans on Douban with his sharp, unique, rigorous and meticulous writing style. It is not impossible for me to associate him with erotic novels, but I always feel that there is something subtle about it – for example, does his rigor need to standardize details such as how many centimeters the client has inserted into the other party?
Why did he suddenly write erotic novels? His explanation is that too many people need entertainment; another reason is that he has written enough to think about a half-day state for a “high-level education” content, so it is better to write something that does not require brains The text of flesh and lust should come more easily. To be honest, I have rarely seen him write novels. It’s not that he can’t write them, but that he always revolves around many practical truths to clarify one thing to others and convince others. It is his goal to be able to be sorted out and found, so that more people can accept the content of Gaotai’s education in the text. Of course, this is not his original idea.
I have seen him contain personal emotions and private goods in his film reviews, and he was immediately scolded, thinking that this was contrary to his previous rigorous and objective perspective. I’ve laughed at him before, if it wasn’t for the fact that I had to set up such a character for myself at the beginning, it would have ended up in this embarrassing situation. He had reflected on it, but later he felt that as long as he was independent enough, he would be able to do other things—it turned out that he was doing other things by writing erotic serialized novels.
There is a conversation between me and him that I think is suitable for this topic today:
He: “Do you think the creation needs to talk about the truth?”
Me: “Why do you want to talk about it? After you have made the truth clear, and everyone is equally smart, then whose money are we going to make?”
He: “Haha, I knew you were this kind of person too.”
Me: “It’s not that you can’t reason, it’s that a person can’t hear the truth from the story that he can use, and he has to wait for others to write the truth and methodology at the end of the article. This is not the author’s problem, but the reader. own problems.”
Him: “That’s right”
Me: “Furthermore, I don’t know if the education you received from childhood was a syllogism model, that is, you must explain clearly to others what, why, and how to do it.”
He: “Yeah, that’s it. I find articles like this boring.”
Me: “If an article like this is considered valuable, isn’t the erotic novel you’re writing considered valuable?”
He: “Haha why suddenly cue me”
Me: “Bad things can also make people learn something, it depends on whether the person who reads it has the ability to summarize.”
He: “Some people can see what is not dirty.”
Me: “That’s what I mean, that’s why there are literati, who feel that other people’s writing is not nutritious, and what you write is educational. However, you don’t know that the shit you throw out attracts stinky maggots to hug each other.”
Him: “Evil enough, but I like it.”
Of course, we discussed the content of erotic literature later, so it is not convenient to share here. However, the topics we have been discussing have not been divorced from “who is defining the indoctrination and the three vulgarities”. People without culture naturally want to see the educational content of Gaotai, so that they will not be found out that they have no culture; people with culture will naturally not write things without culture, for fear of being despised by people; Being indoctrinated by Gaotai, I also want to pretend to be literate, so naturally I don’t dare to write unliterate things. Find another way to subvert those existing big truths from other angles… There is no right or wrong in this game. You can play until the day when the two “artists” die, but when one person dies, the other person also I will feel lonely.
I used to be a “reasonable” person too, but I soon realized that not only did others not need the reasoning that we summed up, but others could sum up better than us. The point is that the world you see and the story I think are hard to match – and it turns out that someone has to argue with them on this point.
Look at “Jin Ping Mei” and quickly look it up, and you only need to read a few words on a page to infer whether there is a bridge in this chapter or this paragraph; I read “Jin Ping Mei” carefully. , just to see how the ancients used the subtle changes of a frown and a smile to advance the plot into the lustful affair it should enter. Is there any truth to “Jin Ping Mei”? This is not the problem of the writer, but what purpose the reader uses to read the book.
It is easy for people to make a mistake, and they always feel that their views are correct, but they cannot listen to other people’s denials. What’s more, those who are afraid that they will be denied will try their best to pretend to be an absolutely objective neutral, both sides, I want to affirm yours, and also praise him. But in the end, it was this group of objective and neutral “literati” who were injured . Most of the reason was that the person who persuaded the fight was too stupid, not that he persuaded him too smartly. Only when the people who fight have a common enemy can they beat the idiots together.
When watching the news, I am obsessed with the news host, and I can see from the pornographic films that there is no right or wrong in the relationship between human beings. To make this point of view public and become a high-level education for another group of people, this is the nasty three vulgars!
“You don’t read Water Margin when you are young, and you don’t read Three Kingdoms when you are old.” Do you think you mean books are not good? No, it means that some people are Gangbi sheep. They don’t eat grass or drink water. They just eat the shit of others. Then, before they can chew it thoroughly, they rush to explain to others what new things they have learned. reason.
This article is reproduced from: https://onojyun.com/2022/05/24/5751/
This site is for inclusion only, and the copyright belongs to the original author.