Original link: https://onojyun.com/2022/09/10/6948/
△ 253｜Grass, Sheep, and Wolf
The last similar title was “Dragon Boat, Woman, and Dog” .
Sheep eat grass and wolves eat sheep, but in this rule transmission, grass cannot eat wolves, so it seems that there is no mutual check and balance between them.
In fact, it is not. Even if there is no grass eating wolves, which is like a cycle of ouroboros, there is a delicate balance between grass, sheep and wolves. If the grass is gone, the sheep will die, and if the sheep die, the wolf will die, and if the wolf dies , the sheep will increase, and then the pasture will disappear. You will find that although there is no essential causal connection between grass and wolf, they are connected by the concept of “death”, and they are also a community of destiny in a sense.
If more rules and simple constraints are added to this chain, they must also be included in the community of destiny.
A few days ago in “Logical Symbiosis” , there was actually a presentation of this point of view – that is, many things that exist relatively exist in essence in a logical relationship. If the conflicting parties lose one of them, the other will disappear immediately. But at this time, there will be another situation. Most people’s understanding of contradictory relationship is that two things will inevitably have a contrast between “good and evil” in the process of opposition. But in the adult world, the separation method of “good and evil” will appear “error” in many practical applications.
In the past two days, I saw a very interesting job – a junior teacher who persuaded to quit. As the name suggests, it is a profession dedicated to helping “Zheng Gong” to persuade “Little San” from quitting. As a professional team, they will make a very complete “resignation plan” according to the situation in the triangular relationship. Some can be completed within three months, and some will have to start a tug of war for more than two years. And the cost is also very considerable, especially the longer the time, the more money it needs to spend.
At first, I understood this kind of “fee” as a kind of “gambling money”, that is, stud chips, to bet on an emotional game where there is no possibility of winning or losing – if the junior was really persuaded away, is this Will the relationship really go back to the way it was before?
Don’t tell me, there are people who are happier after Xiaosan was driven away. I rarely cite some “political scandals”, it’s not that I don’t like to talk about politics, because talking about politics is always guessing in a given situation, a collective illusion that you can’t work at all. (I feel a bit slapped in the face after speaking. Last time, I seemed to have talked about the outflow of New Zealand’s female Prime Minister Ma Lin’s hot dance video)
Elizabeth Truss, the leader of the Conservative Party, who just became British Prime Minister, actually had an episode of “extramarital affairs” in her political career. The reason why she singled out her story is because after her scandal, Her husband appeared to “win the marriage gamble”.
In order to cultivate Truss into an outstanding political figure, she has a political mentor, Field, the representative of the British shadow cabinet. To put it simply, the two of them developed an undeserved relationship in the political education of both teachers and friends. This incident was exposed by the media, and the political scandal of Truss became a hotly debated news.
After this “political scandal” came to light, Field ended his twelve-year marriage, but Tras’s relationship was not only unaffected, but even “a blessing in disguise”. Although there was a brief separation between them, Tras and her husband later gave birth to two more children. Until now, Tras’s husband has become a “symbol” and always appears by Tras’s side. It was proved to the outside that their relationship did not go to the bottom of the political scandal that year, and even because of that experience, the relationship between the two became “different”.
Therefore, there has been a heated discussion in the community, saying that the relationship between Truss and her husband is just a “political show” in order to keep Truss’s character set. Of course, the political maneuvering here, as long as the “methodology” is not presented in a medium that can be published and proven by this group of political jugglers, it maintains the fun of mystery, conspiracy theories, and analysis. As for whether the two of them are “true love”, they have come this far, and what is worth discussing, because that is someone else’s private life after all, even if the other party is the British Prime Minister.
Obviously, Truss’s “political scandal” has not led to the “correct ending of the plot” for many people who like to watch the fun (or those who insist on justice). At least because of the extramarital affair, Truss should experience the same life ending as Field, the object of the extramarital affair. But Tras’s husband “choose to forgive”, and even further emotional sublimation. Therefore, this “political scandal” was seized by the media. The British media often said that Truss’ husband, O’Leary, had two bad things in his life. Ankle.” Another is “the 2006 wife affair scandal broke out.” But the parties do not care about this matter at all, but it is a devastating blow to the principle of “good and evil” in contradictory relationships.
Going back to the profession of “catching the mistress”, after purchasing this service, many clients have made their derailed spouses change their minds and start a better life. According to the principle of “good and evil”, there will be some kind of “great rift” between them, and this rift must be the fuse that leads to the outbreak of bigger conflicts.
Therefore, people will always stand on the sidelines and question the parties who have won the so-called victory in the love game: Do you really hate each other at all? People who have been in a mental cleanliness for a long time often fall into self-doubt and disgust for universal values because others have made some kind of “right or wrong” decision about their own feelings. .
If, when you see this, you also start to insist that “those who drive away the mistress but still maintain their feelings” are absolutely impossible to exist, then you should really keep reading, because the next content will be even more ruined Get rid of your “good and evil” principles.
In the profession of mistress persuasion, a more “cruel” method will be adopted to drive mistresses away. That is, arranging a “personality” to contact the mistress, and through certain means, make the mistress and herself develop feelings “needed by work”, and in this way make the mistress give up the harassment of the original object. When many people hear this setting, they will exclaim: This is simply deceiving other people’s feelings, is this really okay?
I believe that most people will ask this question, because using the standard of “good and evil”, cheating emotions can be said to be a higher priority “evil”, and its appearance will even fight against many situations that have “evil attributes” themselves . This setting is enough to cause many people’s “good and evil” rules to have an “error” pop-up window. The result is even more frightening than this – these “staff” who have established a relationship with the mistress and have feelings for it are very Those with professional ethics will immediately enter the part of peacefully breaking up after completing their work, so that the entire case will be completely over. If you stand from the perspective of the junior, he may first lose his original “true love”, and then be hurt again by a set “emotional deceit”.
Before the rules of “good and evil” are about to collapse, people seem to be able to find a basis for repairing this “error” state: but he is a junior, so what if he is hurt, he didn’t hurt others first Feelings? Well, what if I add another condition: what if this mistress is with someone without knowing it?
This procedure is bound to go wrong here – it was obviously that person who hurt the feelings of two people, and “Zheng Gong” drove away “Little San”, and ended up with the scum who hurt the feelings of two people. Maybe some people’s rules of “good and evil” have already classified that “Zheng Gong” as a scumbag, thinking that this is just a farce of a bitch and a dog – then does the “Zheng Gong” know that? “Little San” is also deceived by his feelings, doesn’t he have any illusions about saving this matter? The key is that “Zheng Gong” not only did not leave this scum, but also won the “little three” – you can feel it, the “error” pop-up window for mental cleanliness has appeared!
It has to be said that this is a typical case of standard desensitization treatment based on the principle of “right and wrong” in a typical conflicting event.
When we put aside “right and wrong,” it’s actually not that complicated. Because right and wrong in the “relative relationship” will immediately fail, and then the “error” warning will pop up in your brain.
Sheep eat grass, and for grass, sheep are “evil”; but wolves eat sheep, and in this chain of relationships, sheep become “good” again; one day, the flock overpopulates and the balance is broken , the turf was gnawed bare, and the wolf was introduced as a key to control the balance. At this time, the wolf also became “good” because it controlled the number of sheep. In the end, whether the sheep was “evil” or “evil” good”?
This article is reproduced from: https://onojyun.com/2022/09/10/6948/
This site is for inclusion only, and the copyright belongs to the original author.