Original link: https://onojyun.com/2022/11/03/7691/
△ 307｜If life is a drama, only 3% of people are screenwriters and actors II
Following yesterday’s content.
There are four kinds of people in this world, which together form a circular “biological chain”. “Screenwriters” explore the human nature in real life and disassemble them into a methodology; unfortunately, only “actors” can understand this methodology. They know how to apply the script to their own world and become a person with personal characteristics. In the end, it is the “audience” who decides whether the “actors” perform well or not. They will come to certain conclusions about the performance, and this conclusion will return to the original “fuzzy concept”, which seems to understand, But only the “actors” can really do it; and after watching the performance, the “audience” also wants to try to imitate and understand human nature. As a result, when they face human nature, they will definitely appear more stylized than the script. More Drama’s plot, this is “behavioral drama”, and these “behavioral dramas” about human nature are like an experiment in human nature, and they are also the source of inspiration for “screenwriters”.
Take the experience of the past few days as an example. People all understand that “people talk to people, and ghosts talk to ghosts”, but not everyone can really remove the core of this sentence. There is no definition of what is a person and what is a ghost. The “screenwriter” needs to disassemble “human” and “ghost”. By observing the social interaction of a lady, they turn it into a script and give it to the “actor”. “Actors” not only know how a lady should act, but also know how to survive in the social circle formed by a lady. This is “fuck talking”. Of course, the ladies themselves are those “audiences”. Do they know the authenticity of the etiquette, emotional expressions, and loving hugs in the ladies’ society? Of course they do, but they have to learn to castrate themselves, because they need to get the emotional value they want from it (such as releasing the pain from the family ignoring them), so it is the “audience” who decides the direction of the plot. In such a plot, there are naturally some “hypocrisy” that are not noticed by others, and dismantling the truth from these “hypocritical” social interactions is the work of the “screenwriter”.
For example, “a person can’t see anyone in his eyes when he speaks” is a standard “table script”, one can understand this sentence and apply it as a methodology to oneself or to define others and act in a diagonal play Yes, only “actors” can. If the “audience” wants to understand this conclusion, it must be performed by the “actor”. They think it is a “role”, but they can’t draw inferences about it. What the “actor” can understand from this script is-” A person’s eyes represent three basic emotions when looking up, looking up, and looking down.”
Characters cannot exist across levels
That is to say, in the SOP formed by these four types of people, no cross-level character can take over the abilities of the previous character. The “audience” cannot directly read the script of the “screenwriter” because it is obscure, detailed, and suppresses sensibility. Even if they could, they couldn’t make inferences about it. This requires the comprehension and acting ability possessed by the “actor” to turn the script into a living character and add his own understanding of the character and human nature; “actor” and “action drama” seem to be common, but “actor” When they didn’t dismantle those real-life plots that were more bullshit than art, they always played the plot that happened at the moment, and they didn’t fully understand the ins and outs of their human nature deduction; “action dramas” couldn’t directly copy “actors”, otherwise they would It will be treated as a neurotic because there is no “audience”.
Characters can flow but cannot break the “cognitive” gate
If you observe everyone in a social event, the larger the sample base, the more you can see the division of the crowd. “Screenwriters” are observers, they are not good at words, but they like to listen;
“Actors” are performers. They are good at intercepting topics from conversations to draw inferences or analogies , but they are not “protagonists”.
The protagonist is the “audience”, they are the creators of the topic, exchange their own stories with each other , and of course it is easy to form a kind of group to evaluate the person who is being regarded as the protagonist;
Finally, the “outliers” in those social activities are “behavioral dramas”, they are not limited by frameworks and can communicate with different people. On the contrary, they may want everyone’s eyes to be on them, whether it is the stories they tell or the charisma they exude, which are strongly intrusive.
“Actors” can’t imitate them, because this group of “acting drama” people are “real”, and their exaggeration and drama are caused by their life experiences. So at this time, two people on the edge of the party began to whisper and began to analyze this exaggerated social center. Most of them were “screenwriters” and “actors”.
However, it is inevitable that there will be topic switching. When a topic becomes obscure and difficult to understand, “screenwriters” may switch to the role of “actors” because they like such topics and begin to interpret their own understanding of an abstract philosophy ; The original “actors” will be transferred to the role of “audience”, because they hope to understand how the “screenwriter” dismantles abstract concepts by listening; the “audience” realizes that he is no longer the protagonist of the scene, Some “audiences” will form their own groups to crowd out the newly formed small groups, and some will switch to “behavioral dramas” to attract everyone’s attention; the interesting thing is that the previous “behavioral dramas” will start to perform because of “screenwriters” Their understanding of abstract concepts is that because of their rich life experiences, they can quickly understand its true meaning as “screenwriters”, and instead, they can narrate the human nature they understand through life experiences.
You will find that all roles can be transformed to the next level, but limited by “cognition”. Of course, there is an even more unbreakable one, which is the inevitable “low intelligence” of the rabble. You tell a group of aunts “audience” that the relationship between man and the universe covers the mystery between husband and wife, and they may not listen, because the conclusion they want is how to make her husband fall in love with him again.
Humanity is the nutrient that supplies the “biological chain”
Those who can better understand the ugliness of human nature are those with pure human nature? Or those whose human nature is just as ugly?
Those who feel that porn will make them bad are also the same group of people who think that porn is too heavy, because they have lost the ability to associate, and are unwilling to accept the truth – “screenwriters” of course know that in most porn, the mosaic below In fact, there is no real insertion of sexual organs; the “actors” know that the exaggerated expressions on the actors’ faces are all stylized – and this group of “audiences” is precisely the most unacceptable reality.
On the other hand, the more people who feel that their human nature is pure, they will create more bullshit because they don’t know what is ugly in human nature.
A few days ago, the employees of Foxconn in Henan went home on foot collectively, and many well-meaning people prepared supplies such as drinking water and bread for these “fleeing” people on the side of the highway. And many nearby villagers drove small tricycles to remove these materials that did not belong to them-is this human ugliness? Of course not, I think this is a kind of pure goodness, because pure goodness has no basic understanding of good and evil in human nature. So there were people who accused this group of people at the time that they acted shamefully — and obviously they didn’t understand what it meant to be shameful. At the time, I was prophesying that the punishment for this group of people was not to educate them to understand human nature, but to use a moral experiment in monkey cages to let them understand the consequences of their actions from their behaviors – such as putting these All the villagers who stole the goods are marked as “close contact” and then quarantined. Although this method is inhumane, it is the most effective and most warning.
The purer the human nature (or the pure in disguise), the easier it will lead to “behavior drama” , because their behavior is out of people’s basic understanding of human nature; and at the end of this abyss, there is another person who looks at the abyss. Humans, the uglier human nature is, the easier it is to become “screenwriters” , because they need to dismantle human nature to suppress the ugly elements of their human nature and prevent it from being put into practice; the same is true for “actors”, the more they care about human nature. With a deep understanding of ugliness, the more they can perform those stories driven by human nature , they are good at digging out the darkness of human nature, but staring into the abyss is bound to be stared at by the abyss, and their human nature cannot be pure. The rest are people who find it “cool” or “outrageous” by watching stories of human nature.
And this proportion is the “normal curve” that everything can’t escape. The proportion of “screenwriters” and “actors” cannot be too high, because most people know that there is an abyss in front of them that can be sucked into them at any time. They will be far away.
Is the role a choice or an “original sin”
Just yesterday, a blogger asked the question I wanted to write today: Can I choose to be an actor or a screenwriter?
To answer this question, you can answer another abstract question: Are you willing to stare into the abyss of human nature?
Where is the abyss of humanity? This is not a question for which there is an answer. Everyone sees the same darkness in the abyss, but the shape inside is indeed ever-changing. For example, since I was a child, it was too easy to identify other people’s emotions, and the abyss I saw was like a collection of various colors. Astrologer, the abyss of human nature she sees will be more wonderful than what I have seen, because each person’s actual “effect” will have a “cause” that can be dismantled down to the smallest detail.
Therefore, being a “screenwriter” or an “actor” is indeed a choice in a sense, because people need to choose whether to stare into the abyss of human nature. The more ugliness you see, the more you can understand the remaining kindness in human nature, but some people fall into the abyss because they understand the “good” of ugliness.
There used to be a book called “Hou Hei Xue”. In fact, the content in it was “talking about people, talking about ghosts”. The ones who can really understand are those who have already entered the abyss and have been dyed black ” The original sinners”, but they are learning “Hou Hei Xue”, and they are no longer learning how to use Hou Hei Xue, but how to use those who want to take advantage of others through Hou Hei Xue.
Although it is indeed a “choice” to become a different character, it is not all, because the abyss of human nature has always been there, staring or not, it will not disappear from our hearts because of our ignorance.
// Who is who is the face of the face
// Everyone has two sides// smile nori
// The devil hides under the smiley face// The moment of love
// just a moment of love can turn into hate// raise る hate み が こ の よ に blood の み に 変 え る
// Accumulated resentment makes the world a river of blood// One inch before dark
// An inch ago was dark// vibrate り for え そ こ も dark
// Back is also dark// で も こ の dark, people は who で も き ず て い な い
// But no one notices this darkness——”The House of Resentment”
This article is reproduced from: https://onojyun.com/2022/11/03/7691/
This site is for inclusion only, and the copyright belongs to the original author.