Kexing’s three-needle anti-infection rate is only 8%?

Recently, a data map about the infection efficiency of Sinovac has been circulated on the Internet. According to the figure, according to the latest data of the fifth round of the epidemic in Hong Kong, the effectiveness of Sinovac’s prevention of Omicron is low, even if it has been vaccinated for the third time. Needle, 14 days after vaccination, the effective rate of preventing infection is only 36%, and after 6 months, only 8% remain. From a rough calculation, there is no big difference in the proportion of infections between inactivated vaccines and mRNA vaccines. Although there is no big difference in the actual infection rate between the two, from the perspective of preventing infection, the effectiveness of inactivated vaccines in preventing infection is indeed lower than that of mRNA vaccines. | Related reading (red net)

Xun Youya

This long article is nothing more than to illustrate that the rumors that the inactivated vaccines on the market are not as effective as mRNA vaccines are false, and that Sinovac vaccines are no worse than Pfizer vaccines at all. In fact, people no longer look at these types of vaccines from the perspective of anti-infection. Today, the effectiveness of vaccines is mainly focused on preventing severe diseases.

However, in this wave of infections in China, too many elderly people are seriously ill, which has caused a medical run, and even the young and middle-aged people with the highest vaccination rate have suffered sequelae such as pneumonia after infection. From this perspective, we cannot Blame everyone for being skeptical about inactivated vaccines.

martin

Which magician’s data is this statistic, I guess 1% is about the same

This article is reproduced from: https://www.fortunechina.com/jingxuan/25627.htm
This site is only for collection, and the copyright belongs to the original author.