Original link: https://onojyun.com/2022/08/13/6551/
△ 225｜Orthopedic doctor and fake football
I don’t remember where I saw a similar short video: a middle-aged man went to the street in the middle of the night and put obstacles painted in the shape of footballs on various places on the street. The next morning there were many men with broken or injured legs, and it was only at this time that the middle-aged man who placed these obstacles the night before revealed his true identity – a doctor at a local private orthopaedic hospital.
The video ends here, and there is no need to explain the ending, but the reversal part is enough for people to reverse the previous plot. Although the story is made up by people, it seems that from these associations that art is higher than life, we can find the joy of returning to life.
In ancient times, Emperor Wen of Sui arranged for commissioners to disguise as bribes to contact officials who might have the idea of accepting bribes. Once the officials had the idea of accepting bribes, Emperor Wen of Sui would order the collection network to catch all these “bribery” officials. This should be regarded as a very early officially authorized “fishing law enforcement” . Like the orthopedic doctor who put obstacles, he predicted the worst scenario, because people who couldn’t help but want to play football on the street, It is also the audience of orthopedic doctors – this logic seems ridiculous, but it is actually very understandable to summarize it with a “Chinese logic” – Emperor Wen of Sui released the hook of bribery, and the big fish who wanted to take bribes must be caught. The cleverness of this logic lies in the fact that it was also mentioned in “Should I peek at the secrets in the other half’s mobile phone” before – if I don’t fish, won’t you be hooked?
In the draft box of the blog, there is an article at serial number 179. The content of that article is “The Chinese Presumption of Guilty”. When I wrote more than 5,000 words in one breath, I realized that this topic is not an everyday topic. The volume of writing can accommodate it, so it is much more interesting to simply save the article and study it fully before feeding it back into the novel.
Chinese people are very good at presumption of guilt, just like Emperor Wen of Sui’s barbs to catch corrupt officials – if you think there is no logical problem in this matter, and the current society is still worth implementing – then you are really thinking. Fits the “presumption of guilt” rule. The core of phishing law enforcement is whether it is because of the deception by law enforcement agencies or state agents that the criminal intent of the parties is prompted, but according to the logic of “presumption of guilt”, criminal intent takes precedence over any antecedents because a person has committed a crime. Intention, so will be deceived. At first glance, there is no problem with this logic, because we put this logic of fishing law enforcement on those “villains” who are ultimately identified as criminals, such as corrupt officials who are bribed and barbed, and who are disguised as criminals. The prostitutes who are caught by the prostitutes’ law enforcement officers, or who hide in the grass and deliberately forge unmanned law enforcement can lure non-motor vehicles to travel.
Then if the deception of this criminal intent is changed to another scene, then people will reduce the priority of “criminal intent” to the lowest level. For example, adults instigate juveniles to commit crimes, neighbors instill the idea of ”killing each other, you can monopolize the love of your parents” to siblings who are not in a good relationship next door, and the love brain played around by scumbags kills their potential Rivals in love… When the real criminals change from “strong” to “weak”, they are also naturally removed from the “villain” hat, and at this time they return to instigating crime – of course, I am here to steal In a different concept, the subject of instigating a crime also has criminal intent, but to be honest, when Emperor Wen of Sui used bribes as a barb to go fishing, did he hope to catch a fish or that everyone cooperated peacefully to deduce it. A good show of Cathay Pacific Min’an? It was because he presumed the other party’s guilt that forced fishing law enforcement to become a legal existence.
Here’s another example: a little boy as a test to test the sanctity of a priest; a teacher to pretend to be a playboy to test the purity of girls’ school girls. Which one do you think is “fishing law enforcement”? In fact, they are both, but the former is unforgivable for many people, while the latter should not be shouldered by this pure female student, but must use this kind of test to test willfulness The teacher of purity is the culprit.
So what’s the difference between the two, it’s just the strength and weakness of the “criminal subject”, and strength and weakness mean that the defense can start from the presumption of guilt or from innocence.
In recent years, online hostility has become more and more obvious, and the Chinese people’s presumption of guilt against others has become more and more exaggerated (of course, the same is true in the United States. In essence, the populism in China and the United States is exactly the same). When a woman is sexually assaulted in public, there will be a group of people who will come forward and point out that the woman is wearing revealing clothes; if a woman drives into her lover, another group of people will come forward and accuse the fault of the man. Women make such extreme behaviors – you will find that the rule of “weak” is invalid at this time, which is one of the reasons why the Chinese are twisted, they sympathize with the weak, but they must learn from the weak (the victim) From the point of view of guilty inferences, it expresses its own objectivity, neutrality and rationality. At the same time, it does not allow the theory of criminal innocence inference, which originally belonged to legal principles, to put criminals into strong and weak attributes to determine their criminal attributes. However, they do not allow any “moderate” in any sense, and in the conclusion part, they must follow the principle of right and wrong that if one party is wrong, the other party is not allowed to be at fault – in this kind of twisted right and wrong In the rules, we look forward to the justice of the “death penalty”, but we also use the method of “what would you do if the person in your time was your family member” to defend justice and the rules.
This kind of twisting and tearing is also the fundamental reason why “The Chinese Presumption of Guilty” cannot be included in daily writing. In the future, this content can be slowly dismantled, and you will see a populism that pays attention to face and intellect. How twisted and twisted the inner world is.
The orthopaedic doctor disguised the obstacles that would cause the client’s fractures as footballs and placed them on the street, so that he became the ultimate beneficiary – so he was the criminal, and the crime was unforgivable ; the reason why the orthopedic doctor disguised these obstacles as footballs It is placed on the street because during the World Cup, there will always be a group of crazy fans yelling, kicking and smashing in the street, which has caused the mental breakdown of the surrounding residents, and it is the “just” behavior of this orthopaedic doctor. A group of crazy fans were punished. Although he was the beneficiary, he still gave the street a quiet place. Punishing those who had a negative impact on society belonged to everyone’s common benefit – so he became the embodiment of justice and made atonement for his crimes. .
This article is reproduced from: https://onojyun.com/2022/08/13/6551/
This site is for inclusion only, and the copyright belongs to the original author.