Original link: https://headsalon.org/archives/9077.html
【2022-05-02】
@whigzhou: I read a post by Mark Hertling, a retired military officer, about the organizational model and tactical training of the US military. One of the things that impressed me deeply was that the organizational and combat model of the US military (in fact, it is also promoted by the entire NATO) has two basic premises (paraphrased This is a general idea, far from the original words): 1) During the training process, all parties involved should try their best to find and expose problems, instead of always thinking about getting high scores in the mock exam, 2) The tactical design of subordinates against superiors is not feasible or The parts that are difficult to implement must be given feedback without any scruples. Only in this way can the tactics become the property of the grassroots combat units themselves, rather than waiting for the people holding the textbooks to issue orders before they can be executed. Just like this, the grassroots units Only when the chief officer is killed in battle, or when he loses contact with his superiors, or when the superiors have no time to take care of them, can they still maintain combat capabilities,
This model can only be implemented under certain cultural and institutional conditions.
Wujun has been able to change to this model in the past eight years because her system has changed, and her organizational culture has also changed.
This article is transferred from: https://headsalon.org/archives/9077.html
This site is only for collection, and the copyright belongs to the original author.