4 “Don’t”! The Ministry of Foreign Affairs asks Japan
On August 8, Foreign Ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin hosted a regular press conference. A reporter asked, recently, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida said that Japan strongly condemned that the missiles launched by China’s military exercises fell into Japan’s “exclusive economic zone”, and noted that China did not recognize this. Kishida said that this is related to Japan’s national and national security, and has a serious impact on the peace and stability of the international community. What is China’s comment?
Wang Wenbin said: We firmly oppose Japan’s wrong remarks and unreasonable accusations. Whether it is legal, political or moral, Japan has no right or right to make irresponsible remarks on the Taiwan issue.
A few days ago, State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi sternly refuted Japan’s remarks at the series of foreign ministers’ meetings on East Asia cooperation. Japan has illegally occupied and practiced colonial rule in Taiwan for half a century, killing more than 600,000 Taiwan compatriots, plundering a large number of local resources, and forcibly recruiting laborers from many countries, including Southeast Asian countries, and many people were tortured to death. In 1943, the “Cairo Declaration” issued by China, the United States and the United Kingdom clearly stipulated that the Chinese territory stolen by Japan, including Taiwan and the Penghu Islands, should be returned to China. Article 8 of the Potsdam Proclamation issued in 1945 states that the Cairo Declaration will be implemented. After that, Japan accepted the Potsdam Proclamation and announced its unconditional surrender. In 1972, the Sino-Japanese Joint Statement signed during the normalization of Sino-Japanese diplomatic relations clearly stipulated that the Japanese government fully understands and respects the Chinese government’s position that Taiwan is an inalienable part of Chinese territory, and insists on abiding by Article 8 of the Potsdam Proclamation. Such a history, Japan should not forget, and needs to reflect on it from time to time.
Japan has been so high-profile on the Taiwan issue recently, has it forgotten the commitment it made when it signed the Sino-Japanese Joint Statement? Is it to subvert the political foundation of Sino-Japanese relations? Do you have the ambition to encroach on Taiwan, China again? Does the Japanese side want to use this to build up its armament, abandon the “peace constitution”, and stop taking the path of peaceful development? The Japanese side should give a responsible account to the international community on these issues.
As for the Japanese side’s claim that the Chinese military’s training activities involve the so-called Japan’s exclusive economic zone, and that China and Japan have not yet demarcated the boundary in the relevant waters, how can it come to Japan’s exclusive economic zone? Taiwan is China’s territory. China conducts normal military exercises in the waters surrounding its own territory. It is open, transparent, and professional, in line with domestic law, international law, and international practice. It is not only a warning to provocateurs, but also to safeguard national sovereignty and territory. Completely legitimate.
The Chinese side urges the Japanese side to seriously reflect on the history of aggression, recognize the high sensitivity of the Taiwan issue, abide by the principles of the four political documents between China and Japan and the commitments it has made so far, stop following the trend of echoing the negative words and deeds of the United States concerning Taiwan, and stop cooperating with the United States in “using Taiwan to control China”. Wrong actions to avoid further serious damage to the relationship between the two countries.
Source: Zhihu www.zhihu.com
Author: China Net
[Zhihu Daily] The choice of tens of millions of users, to be a big cow of new things in the circle of friends.
click to download
There are 363 more answers to this question, see all.
Further reading:
This article is reproduced from: http://www.zhihu.com/question/547487669/answer/2617254710?utm_campaign=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_source=rss&utm_content=title
This site is for inclusion only, and the copyright belongs to the original author.