Original link: https://onojyun.com/2022/05/20/5633/
△ 140｜The person who was at fault for peeking at the letter should not have been peeping in the first place
After timing the article, I realized that this article will be published on May 20. Since the Chinese people did not allow “foreign festivals”, these “e-commerce festivals” created by merchants have become the focus of various e-commerce campaigns. After thinking about it, the topic I was going to talk about today has something to do with the 520 festival, which is related to feelings.
The topic came from a point of view on a show. The daughter-in-law and the mother-in-law discussed together the most unbearable behavior of the mother-in-law in the relationship between the mother-in-law and the daughter-in-law. Among them, they discussed the fact that the mother-in-law would peek at the daughter-in-law’s letters, or steal the daughter-in-law’s express delivery. The daughter-in-law Fang nodded frequently, thinking that this was indeed something they couldn’t bear. At this time, a mother-in-law representative in the mother-in-law’s party said righteously: “The mother-in-law peeked at the letter is not the mother-in-law’s problem, but the daughter-in-law did not keep the envelope or hide it. The daughter-in-law’s letter to the nanny was not placed in the In the envelope, the mother-in-law will “accidentally” see it, so the responsibility still lies with the daughter-in-law.”
The host was probably too lazy to argue with the mother-in-law’s remarks, so she nodded her head in praise, and the daughter-in-law, who was sitting opposite, also expressed “agree”, and finally concluded: “Anyone who is unhappy about the mother-in-law is the daughter-in-law. Responsibility.”
To be honest, I was convinced by this logic at the moment, and I couldn’t even find the loophole in it—the letter was peeped because I didn’t hide the letter well, so it was peeped.
As I said before, after I found out that my “diary” and “novel” had been peeked when I was a child, I began to deliberately write something that I wanted them to “peek”. For “peekers”, because they get The way the information is presented is in a “peeking” mode, so they will have a lot of trust in the authenticity of its content. Not only that, because they were “peeked”, they couldn’t show their knowledge of some “secrets” at a realistic level, and could only ask and intervene by side-by-side.
I don’t know if you understand a certain kind of pleasure: you deliberately make up a sentence to someone who is pretending to be pushy: “I went to a very delicious tea restaurant last time, the cream bag is very delicious, but the price is a bit expensive, but it is worth it .” If the other party is someone who likes to pretend and likes to bring all the focus back to himself, he will most likely say “I have eaten it myself.” At this time, you will hold back your laughter, because you know that you just made up something, and it happens that you will get into this trap. You can’t close the net in such a hurry, but you have to play a lot. This kind of love is being held. walking people.
When the “peekers” are unable to extricate themselves in the trap I have set up, they will only be led by the nose with my information. As a result, one day I really didn’t want to play anymore, so I complained that I didn’t want them to peek at my diary anymore. At this time, I came to “that conclusion” – “You put the diary in the drawer, why can’t we read it, and you don’t hide it, how? Can parents not see what their children have written? In case you have A disease or something, we can find it in time!”
So later I directly admitted in the “diary” that I have been compiling a diary all the time because I knew that I would be peeped. It seems that since then, when I know that my “days” are virtual and have no reference value, no one will peep.
In fact, there is no right or wrong in this matter, because I have been a boring gourd since I was a child, and it is very easy to live in my own world. Many things I will turn into very strange novels, so naturally people want to “peep” The real me, so I didn’t blame the “peekers”, maybe this was really the only way they knew – and it turned out I was fucking making it up.
Some of the same logic can be very subtly extended to feelings: “You put your mobile phone there, and I will see what’s wrong when a message arrives. You went to take a bath, and I accidentally saw the mobile phone by the bedside. If you If you care so much, take it with you to take a shower!” → “You have to bring your cell phone in the shower, do you have a ghost in your heart?” → “If I didn’t peek, I wouldn’t even know you were messing around behind my back” → “I If you don’t peek, you won’t mess around!” Well, the logic is perfectly closed.
The fun is that people who have ghosts in their hearts are often trapped by another person who has ghosts in their hearts with such a closed-loop logic. The reason why I admit the “perfection” of this logic is that this logic is a step-by-step trap-style logic. Just like the logic advancement in the emotional world just mentioned, if you point out the flaws in this logic, you will be immediately caught by the next trap – why? Because from the very beginning, it was because there was a ghost in this person that he was approached step by step.
However, it is precisely because he has a ghost in his heart that he is bound to a ghost. Otherwise, if the two of them are separated, they will have to harm the other two. Logic fall in love and kill each other!
This article is reproduced from: https://onojyun.com/2022/05/20/5633/
This site is for inclusion only, and the copyright belongs to the original author.