Original link: https://leo.moe/daily/80.html
things to know
BGP.NET’s network has always been known for overselling, and their family often sells these broadband products second-hand, so they are also known as second-hand dealers. Generally, I recommend avoiding such businesses.
But there are still people who are very interested in the network quality of their home. Today, I found a VPS that rents a BGP.NET line to test it, which is a curiosity. Although the test is a test, I still do not recommend buying it, because it is particularly unstable at night. The speed graphs given by many businesses are multi-threaded, which does not mean that a single thread can run.
basic information
CPU：E5-2680V3 @ 1 core内存：1G硬盘：20GB宽带：40Mbps
This CPU is relatively common in the LowEnd market. It is a 14-year-old foreign garbage, and its performance is relatively high. The LemonBench single-core running score is 600~700.
However, it should be noted that although I chose the top 40Mbps broadband, but in fact, I understand what the quality of BGP.NET is like, and I can’t run it with a single thread. Generally, it can run 30Mbps.
traceroute
Beijing Telecom 163
root@ecs-FjntJ:~# nexttrace -T -q 1 36.112.226.193 IP Geo Data Provider: LeoMoeAPI traceroute to 36.112.226.193, 30 hops max, 32 byte packets Hop IP Lantency ASN Country Province City Owner 1 118.107.57.1 27.30ms 64050 Japan Tokyo Tokyo CTG Server Ltd. 2 10.7.3.13 4.95ms LAN Address LAN Address 3 182.54.128.17 1.49ms 64050 Singapore Singapore BGP Consultancy Pte Ltd 4 121.59.140.61 2.42ms 23764 Japan Tokyo Tokyo Chinatelecom Next Carrying Network backbone 5 69.194.165.190 1.13ms 23764 China Hong Kong China Telecom Global Limited 6 203.22.182.18 1.69ms China Hong Kong 中国电信7 59.43.250.226 41.22ms 日本东京都东京Chinatelecom Next Carrying Network backbone 8 59.43.247.125 59.53ms 中国北京市北京市中国电信9 * 10 59.43.132.17 63.15ms 中国北京市北京市中国电信11 * 12 36.112.226.193 52.97ms 4847 中国北京市北京市中国电信
Beijing Telecom is directly connected, there is no detour, and the other two networks (China Unicom and China Mobile) have the same routing, so they will not be expanded here, the same below.
Shanghai Telecom 163
root@ecs-FjntJ:~# nexttrace -T -q 1 101.95.52.34 IP Geo Data Provider: LeoMoeAPI traceroute to 101.95.52.34, 30 hops max, 32 byte packets Hop IP Lantency ASN Country Province City Owner 1 118.107.57.1 10.91ms 64050 Japan Tokyo Tokyo CTG Server Ltd. 2 10.7.3.13 20.25ms LAN Address LAN Address 3 182.54.128.17 1.13ms 64050 Singapore Singapore BGP Consultancy Pte Ltd 4 121.59.140.61 1.30ms 23764 Japan Tokyo Tokyo Chinatelecom Next Carrying Network backbone 5 69.194.165.190 1.27ms 23764 China Hong Kong China Telecom Global Limited 6 203.22.182.18 1.52ms China Hong Kong 中国电信7 59.43.183.1 31.11ms 日本东京都东京Chinatelecom Next Carrying Network backbone 8 59.43.246.217 37.12ms 中国上海市上海市中国电信9 * 10 101.95.88.42 26.96ms 4812 中国上海市上海市中国电信11 61.152.71.38 46.30ms 4812 中国上海市上海市中国电信12 101.95.52.34 46.33ms 4812 中国上海市上海市中国电信
Guangdong Telecom 163
root@ecs-FjntJ:~# nexttrace -T -q 1 gd.189.cn [Info] IPv6 Traceroute is not supported right now. IP Geo Data Provider: LeoMoeAPI traceroute to 61.140.99.33 (gd.189.cn), 30 hops max, 32 byte packets Hop IP Lantency ASN Country Province City Owner 1 118.107.57.1 1.18ms 64050 Japan Tokyo Tokyo CTG Server Ltd. 2 10.7.3.13 1.05ms LAN Address LAN Address 3 182.54.128.17 1.51ms 64050 Singapore Singapore BGP Consultancy Pte Ltd 4 121.59.140.61 1.20ms 23764 Japan Tokyo Tokyo Chinatelecom Next Carrying Network backbone 5 69.194.166.73 1.29ms 23764 China Hong Kong China Telecom Global Limited 6 203.22.182.18 1.61ms China Hong Kong 中国电信7 59.43.184.177 49.32ms 中国上海市上海市中国电信8 * 9 59.43.138.45 32.67ms 中国上海市上海市中国电信10 59.43.137.225 66.44ms 中国广东省广州市中国电信11 59.43.141.145 54.44ms 中国广东省广州市中国电信12 * 13 183.63.68.238 53.24ms 4134 中国广东省广州市中国电信14 183.63.68.238 52.80ms 4134 中国广东省广州市中国电信15 219.135.131.213 51.18ms 4134 中国广东省广州市中国电信16 219.135.131.194 60.11ms 4134 中国广东省广州市中国电信17 219.135.131.201 54.33ms 4134 中国广东省广州市中国电信18 219.135.131.201 62.67ms 4134 中国广东省广州市中国电信19 61.140.99.33 63.97ms 4134 中国广东省广州市中国电信
Guangdong is a little detoured, and it will take Shanghaikou to go back and forth.
network speed test
Don’t look at the above delay is very good-looking, the characteristics of BGP.NET are like this, multi-threading is beautiful, and single-threading is terrible.
Superbench
ID 测速服务器信息上传/Mbps 下载/Mbps 延迟/ms 3633 电信|上海↑ 40.23 ↓ 39.87 27.32 17145 电信|安徽合肥５Ｇ ↑ 41.18 ↓ 33.52 58.04 27594 电信|广东广州５Ｇ ↑ 20.75 ↓ 32.40 53.18 5396 电信|江苏苏州５Ｇ ↑ 40.44 ↓ 39.35 33.05 23844 电信|湖北武汉↑ 41.38 ↓ 39.55 49.25 29353 电信|湖北武汉５Ｇ ↑ 41.25 ↓ 39.60 47.38 28225 电信|湖南长沙５Ｇ ↑ 43.64 ↓ 38.99 59.03 3973 电信|甘肃兰州↑ 41.98 ↓ 39.12 55.07 24447 联通|上海５Ｇ ↑ 44.28 ↓ 40.30 137.30 13704 联通|江苏南京↑ 41.25 ↓ 39.70 37.91 4870 联通|湖南长沙↑ 44.61 ↓ 22.00 134.24
It should be noted that the SpeedTest used by SuperBench is multi-threaded, so it seems that the speed is not bad.
If the Telecom 163 uses a single-threaded speed measurement, it will look like the above…
Summarize
Although it is a real CN2 GIA, the actual experience is far from the quality that CN2 should have. This is the most appropriate evaluation of BGP.NET. In addition, most of the IDCs that sell BGP.NET VPS are mainly small businesses. Neither stability nor speed should be the first choice.
Nowadays, there are already better options at the same price. RCP of 9929, CMI’s FxTransit, Misaka, DMIT, SaltyFish, microcomputer host, they can get first-hand lines, in any case, they are more expensive than BGP.NET distributors. Too reliable.
This article is reprinted from: https://leo.moe/daily/80.html
This site is for inclusion only, and the copyright belongs to the original author.