Original link: https://yipai.me/695.html
Despite changing work locations several times, without exception, there will always be traffic jams on one or several sections of the road. This situation usually occurs when exiting the expressway or turning. In this case, I usually drive to the front to compress the line and plug it. Despite being photographed a few times, once I got it once I knew what angle would not be photographed, and would never be caught on camera again (although there is a risk of being caught by a dash cam and reported).
Most drivers don’t like to be blocked by others. If they are good-tempered, they will scold them a few times. If they are grumpy, they will even get road rage and even kick the accelerator. In the face of irritability, the stopper can only admit that he is unlucky, who will let himself not take care of it? But I have never encountered this situation. Because I have mastered the art of gasse.
Fast, accurate, and ruthless are the keys to stoppage. First of all, you have to have the intention of stopping a long time in advance, but you must not reveal it and pretend that you are going straight. Once you find that there is a gap to drill, for example, a driver is playing with a mobile phone and the distance between you and the car in front increases, you have to go in the direction without hesitation, and when you complete the lane change, he will not even notice it. The car behind him was incompetent and furious. If there is no such car, it has to be forcibly jammed. At this time, it depends on who is mentally strong. Generally speaking, everyone is rushing to work and is unwilling to waste time dealing with accidents, so you can act recklessly; however, there are always some ruthless people. When you find that the other party will not let you, you must admit it in time, after all, you don’t want to Deal with the accident and still take full responsibility. In addition, you must not turn on the “rear accelerator” (turn signal) when adding a stopper, otherwise the vehicles behind will accelerate and you will definitely not be able to get in.
As far as my personal experience is concerned, as long as you prepare early, you will always encounter a few drivers who are playing with mobile phones or inattention, resulting in a large gap with the car in front. Therefore, it is generally easy to stop and the other party does not even need to step on the brakes. Should such a gasser be condemned? I don’t think it should be condemned, but encouraged.
If the road is clear, of course no one wants to block others. In many cases, congestion is not because of accidents, but because of speeding cars, or even congestion for no reason. When you pass the congested road section, you find that there is no accident in front of you, just because many drivers are too poor, and the small curve slows down significantly, which triggers a chain reaction. ” Unexpectedly, the most common reason is” There is no reason for the “traffic jam. “. If you can find a way to get out of here at this time, you can reduce the number of congested vehicles, thereby reducing the congestion.
For the scene in front of you playing with a mobile phone or other reasons that cause the car in front to speed up, you should not be blocked by such a fool. Although the driving school teacher will tell you that the solid line is the “wall”, don’t hit the wall. Moreover, the Road Traffic Safety Law stipulates that it is forbidden to change lanes on solid lines, otherwise points will be deducted and fines will be deducted. But if you still have the mentality of “law-abiding” at this time, it can only be said that you are elm-brained. In this case, as long as there is no camera, going to the compaction line to overtake is the “normal” choice. In this scenario, it is more reasonable to block the line from the next lane.
From this, it can be deduced whether the people need to follow the “evil laws”? As Mr. Luo Xiang said, “If a law conforms to the formal characteristics of law, but if it loses the righteousness of law, then evil law is illegal.” What kind of law is bad law? First and foremost, it is ambiguity. The rulers of China have always paid attention to “unknown punishment, unpredictable power”. This technique of imperial control has been passed down to the present, such as the common “according to relevant laws and regulations”, “relevant departments”, etc., but you don’t know in the end According to which article of the law, and what kind of department is the relevant department?
A video of the author named “Xu Yun Wandering in China” I often watch at station B. He rides the Sichuan-Tibet and Xin-Tibet lines, and he is very good. Today, I was banned for “violating relevant regulations” (station B, watermelon, Weibo, etc.). Xu Yun was definitely not banned because he didn’t cooperate with the epidemic prevention. He did nucleic acid tests every time he went, and he was quarantined by the green code several times. What is that for? It is said that it is because he said in the video that he saw many closed stores during the trip, the economy was in recession, and the epidemic prevention policy was unreasonable. What can I say now, and what can I not say? Again, only the real anti-thief can perfectly avoid all G-spots.
Of course, every time this happens, there are always people who say that you deserve to be banned, who makes you not cooperate with the epidemic prevention policy (or other policies) and so on, we “abide by the law and rules”, we will not encounter This situation. For this kind of person, I just want to say, it’s just that the iron fist didn’t hit you. Xu Yun was also very popular before he was attacked. I don’t know if there will be any changes after being attacked. If there are no restrictions on power, sooner or later you will encounter someone who is inexplicably attacked “for violating relevant laws and regulations”. After all, although “hooliganism” has been abolished, “picking quarrels and provoking trouble” still exists.
This article is reprinted from: https://yipai.me/695.html
This site is for inclusion only, and the copyright belongs to the original author.