Original link: https://cry33.com/archives/1050.html
On September 26, 2022, the movie “Hidden in the Dust” depicting the real countryside was removed from the shelves of the entire network.
Here is an introduction for readers who are not familiar with this film. The protagonists, Ma Laosi and Cao Guiying, are two low-level little people in the northwest countryside who have no sense of existence. After being abandoned by their respective families of origin, they were brought together to live together. From strange conflict to mutual support, they worked hard to cultivate their happy little world. (There are too many scenes of warmth, so I won’t spoil them one by one here.)
At the end of the movie, when the new house for the two was completed, it felt that life was finally over. Guiying accidentally fell into a canal and drowned on the way to deliver food to her husband. Ma Laosi was left with nothing in an instant. When he was disheartened, he took the pesticide bottle… (No spoilers)
Before it was taken off the shelves, the score of “Hidden in the Dust” was as high as 8.5 on Douban. During the release of the film, different from the official Buddhist propaganda, many big V from the media used love to generate electricity and promoted “Hidden in the Dust” for free. This shows how good the quality of this film is.
It was such a movie that was considered excellent by the public, but it was removed from the shelves on September 26. There are different opinions on the reasons for the removal. Regarding the delisting incident, there are also different voices on the Internet.
Some netizens believe that the rural life filmed in this film is very real and makes them feel very immersed. Some people even think that this is the countryside in their lives. After watching the movie, some people have feelings: Even the lives of ordinary little people should not be buried, and the life attitude of the bottom is more worthy of being seen by the world. They think they don’t understand it very well.
For the removal, some people also expressed applause. They felt that the film was smearing the countryside. And the suffering in the movie is too much, not enough truth, goodness and beauty, not enough positive energy. They believe that making this film is completely smearing the country’s poverty alleviation work, and it is grandstanding. So for the removal, they are very in favor of it.
What do you think as a reader?
How to get movie resources:
Follow the official account Qingjian , and send a message to hide in the dust to get it. Follow me to get the latest software/video resources.
This article is reprinted from: https://cry33.com/archives/1050.html
This site is for inclusion only, and the copyright belongs to the original author.