Original link: https://onojyun.com/2022/06/16/6216/
△ 167｜Reversal Drama
There has been a very interesting news in the past two days, but to be honest, the plot is a bit old-fashioned and vulgar.
A woman took a black car home at 3 a.m., but was followed by the black car driver to the door. The woman claimed that the black car driver stayed at the door and knocked on the door. After the woman asked, she found out that the man was the black car driver who sent her home, and the man knocked at the door. Several times the door refused to leave. The woman told the man to stop knocking in the house. The man found a camera at the door of his house, and the man “run away.” News is basically like this, and there are some more “subjective” words in it, such as “black car”, “following”, “running away” and so on.
Unexpectedly, this conjecture was quickly reversed. It was the end of the woman who apologized to the Internet in front of the camera at the gate of the Public Security Bureau. In the end, the official conclusion was “a misunderstanding”. It was the woman who misunderstood the driver of the black car. This is a plot of “occupying public resources”. Here is a link where a person needs to turn his head – if it is an ordinary “misunderstanding”, does the person really need to shoot an apology video at the gate of the public security bureau? In other words, this incident itself has already caused a bad impact on society, and it is even possible that the female side may deliberately fabricate facts, so it is necessary to use such a “reversal drama” as the ending.
There is a saying that the woman left on the pretext of refusing to pay the black car driver’s fare and went home to get money because her mobile phone was out of power. Only then did the woman unilaterally write a large “small composition”, accusing the driver of the black car of plotting against her. That is to say, this incident itself will indeed cause a lot of social impact, and there is “some fault” on the female side, so there will be such absurd but reasonable plots.
Regarding this matter, I have posted a circle of friends, but it is clear that this circle of friends will provoke a lot of friends in the circle of friends who can eventually be involved in “gender issues” no matter what their actions are:
I told you five years ago that sooner or later the era of small essays of unilateral accusations will come to an end. Because the cases reported by women have always existed in a sensitive area that cannot be reconciled in the traditional Chinese judicial field, and it is also a fundamental principle deeply embedded in Chinese people’s logical thinking – whoever is weaker is justified. In ancient times, women told men to violate the law, and they must give priority to what women tell the truth. In order to avoid lies between the two sides, it was a judicial model in which men and women each played fifty major boards. It’s hard to tell who’s lying. Because modern justice has more evidence, it is better to judge rationally. For example, a woman tells a man that she was sexually assaulted. But in the process of judicial judgment, of course, it is necessary to investigate whether there is a chat between men and women who agree to have sexual relations. Record. But the problem is that the “Internet Court” does not believe that any wrongdoing by the female side should be examined. They require that the victim must be flawless , so women told that there should be absolutely no flaws as in ancient times. What then? There can only be a relatively objective method that cannot stimulate the “cyber court”, that is, the monitoring system, using video evidence as the perspective that should have been cut from the evidence of both parties. At this time, a more touching logic emerges: yo, when monitoring was needed in the past, it was bad, but now the monitoring involving this situation is good – the cyber court will define “monitoring evidence” as a person, Thus defining it as “bad”, and then denying its evidential validity. So this matter is really difficult to solve. This is also the fundamental reason why I did not plan to continue this industry, because I expected the abnormal impact of the Internet on the popularization of law and the construction of the rule of law. I personally think that China has implemented the “death penalty system for feudal crimes”, and all those involving gender issues have adopted the “Internet Public Opinion Court System”. Everyone is happy!
I used to get asked “legal questions” a lot, but these questions were somewhat “purposeful”, and they wanted to hear some rhetoric about the “partiality” of the law from me as a law student. But often after explaining, they won’t get their approval and approval, and they will even be considered “Did I deliberately stand in the perspective of a criminal to discuss the law?” This kind of “helping the gangster” role is also destined to prevent me from becoming them. A “good lawyer” in my mind.
I thought about this very seriously, and finally realized that the problem is that they do not allow the “presumption of guilt for the victim” and the “presumption of innocence for the perpetrator”. Before the judicial system makes a judgment on the crime, they already have a pre-judgment mechanism – that is, the victim is not allowed to have faults, and even if there is, these faults are caused by the actions of the perpetrator, prompting the victim Do some kind of “appearance”.
For example, even if according to judicial procedures, it has been found that the so-called female victims had already had ambiguous chat content before having sex with the male perpetrator, and women also accepted sex with men. But after the woman had sex with the man, she changed her mind and sued the man for raping herself. How should such a case be judged? Of course, it must return to whether both parties have subjective affirmation of what happened in the sexual relationship, whether women have suffered coercion, and so on.
At this time, people who think that the “victims are flawless” are of course not allowed to investigate the “privacy” between women and men about whether they have sexual relations. Even if there is, it is a kind of “superficial approval” made by women. , the reason why they agreed to have sex with men was because they were bewitched or coerced by the male side at that time – in short, as the victim, the female side is not allowed to have any possible flaws, if there is, then It must be a man’s problem.
In the future, there will be more and more such reversal dramas, because public opinion and the Internet have formed a pre-judgment system for these cases, especially those involving gender issues, these pre-judgments will be more undeniable and doubtful. ——Of course, it will be even more exciting when it is reversed.
This article is reproduced from: https://onojyun.com/2022/06/16/6216/
This site is for inclusion only, and the copyright belongs to the original author.