As for YPL’s “fighting” again, on the morning of April 23, Xinxuan Company responded to the media: The inspection found that the incident was caused by the dispute before and after the transfer of the trademark holder’s trademark, and it was not a fake… Former trademark holder Australia After Health Industry Co., Ltd. applied for the transfer of the trademark to Australian YPL Co., Ltd., there was a dispute between the two parties on authorizing a third party to use the trademark before and after the transfer. Therefore, the trademark transferee claimed that the products promoted in the live broadcast room “do not belong to the products of the YPL brand.” ” statement… Xinxuan said that it deeply regrets the trouble caused to consumers by the trademark disputes between the two companies, and will provide a full refund for all consumers who have purchased YPL products through the Xiaohuangche link in Xinxuan’s live broadcast room. payment.
media coverage
IT Home NetEase News CNBeta Fast Technology TechWeb
Related events
- Simba responds again to “selling fakes”: due to the dispute over the trademark transfer of the trademark holder, the consumer will be fully refunded2022-04-23
- Simba’s anchor was exposed to sell fake products, and the brand involved clarified: non-genuine products will be held accountable2022-04-22
This article is reprinted from: https://readhub.cn/topic/8frza1oDslK
This site is for inclusion only, and the copyright belongs to the original author.