lost cat

Original link: https://onojyun.com/2022/06/18/6219/

△ 169|Lost Cat

Someone “lost” a cat in the company’s office building.

It has been two days and no one has come to claim it, because we have expressed to the property management that we can accept the adoption of the lost cat, so the property management is very anxious to find us to adopt the cat. In fact, I can understand this. After all, the property management party has issued a claim announcement, and they themselves have not fulfilled their long-term escrow obligations for the lost cat. So when I finally see someone who can take over this “hot potato”, I can’t wait to “throw” this thing out.

Because the company is considering taking over this matter, but in fact there are many concerns and possibilities – if we take over this cat, we will definitely take it for a medical examination first, if it is found to have cat plague at this time. disease, the responsibility for this treatment is transferred to the studio. When people have compassion, they will inevitably make impulsive decisions . For example, they decide to claim the cat, but the cat has a disease and it costs a lot of money to treat it; “adopted” cats…

At this time, I seemed very “cold-blooded”, and I considered almost all possibilities. For example, the cat did have a disease and was abandoned. How should the cost of treatment be covered? If it is cured and the original owner suddenly appears at this time, how will these expenses that have been incurred be redistributed? Because I think the property management party simply wants to get rid of the “custodial obligation”, and after finding someone who can adopt it, they will transfer the custody obligation and risk of losing the cat to a new subject. Even if there is an original cat owner, they can use the “mixed mud” method to mediate the conflict between the adopter and the original owner-because they completely get rid of this “hot potato”.

The final solution is that we and the property management party expressed some “ugly words” about the division of responsibilities. For example, firstly, we can adopt cats, but we have the right to conduct physical examinations on cats. If there are diseases such as cat distemper, the property management party will provide the treatment costs if we cannot afford the treatment costs; if not, we will Put forward the suggestion of “euthanasia”. If the property management party still does not agree, the lost cat will be returned to the property management party for management; if the property management party agrees, if the original owner subsequently appears and a legal dispute occurs, all the consequences shall be borne by the property management party ; Second, if the cat is lost, we will adopt it. If the original owner appears in the future, the property management party shall bear the custody and feeding expenses incurred by us during the adoption period. The property management party shall communicate and claim compensation from the original owner on its own. It is forbidden for the property management party to take the lead in mediating us and the original owner. In the case of the settlement of expenses between the parties, the property management party, as an intermediate third party, implements the right of subrogation.

To be honest, although I had a momentary sympathy for it, there are some possibilities that may seem “out of place” at the moment, but if it does happen, the only embarrassment is ourselves.

The result was reversed, and an even more embarrassing thing happened – the above half of the content was written two days ago. At that time, everyone was still discussing whether to adopt this cat. As a result, today’s story has an embarrassing direction- – So much so that it has become embarrassing for us to “divide responsibility” so seriously with property management.

The cat that was “lost” was not temporarily kept at the property management office. When a colleague saw it, he was sure that it was abandoned or lost. Because of this preset condition, Everything that followed was an awkward push towards this precondition. Because of the false premise of “losing the cat”, we thought it was an abandoned cat, so the property management party could only temporarily host it; I mistakenly thought that we had “adopted” the cat because we were too damn good. Then, because of this wrong premise, the two sides deduced the next wrong and embarrassing conclusion – we feel that the property management is in charge of the cat, so we are trying our best to shirk the responsibility; and the property management thinks that our kindness has exploded and we have adopted the cat. cat.

If there is no false premise, in fact, a cat owner is about to do something and temporarily tether the cat to the lobby on the first floor. As a result, it happened to be seen by colleagues in the studio at this time. When he saw the cat’s At that time, all the episodes about “abandonment” and “abandonment” were already staged in my mind, and then the more I thought about it, the more pitiful I felt, and then I presupposed this wrong premise, which led to an embarrassing situation later.

In fact, in “Good Guys and Bad Guys” , I have mentioned part of the content. People who always presume imaginary enemies in their minds will actually be too subjective to the objective situation of a certain thing. For example, in the case of “losing a cat”, the question that should be considered is not “Should we adopt this cat”, but “is this cat really a lost cat?”. Because we are not the parties involved and do not know the objective situation of the scene, but because the information transmitted by colleagues is mixed with too many subjective analyses of individuals, and in order to make people believe him, he disguised it as a very clever dismantling. Explained into “objectivity” and “emotional rendering”. The “objective” part is like looking at the neighbor’s situation after losing the axe. How you look at it and how you analyze it are all viewed from the perspective of “he threw the axe”; and the “emotional rendering” part is to use the The “objectivity” of the preamble is infected with a kind of “empathy transmission” of sympathy. Finally, according to the usual routine of the “imaginary enemy” model, he pulled himself out of the “sympathy” that had been flooded, and re-analyzed the matter from an absolutely objective perspective, and then re-analyzed it from the perspective of God. The beginning and the end of this matter, and finally his conclusion as the qualitative of the whole matter.

Including me, because starting from this wrong premise, I was once again “deceived”, and instinctively thought that those “objective” analyses were really leading to a tragedy of losing a cat. The conclusion is wrong, and the plot behind it is just another game of God being led by the nose.

Another new insight: If you don’t experience it yourself, don’t tell the story of others.

This article is reproduced from: https://onojyun.com/2022/06/18/6219/
This site is for inclusion only, and the copyright belongs to the original author.

Leave a Comment