// @XDash: Some plans for the current Web3Q evolution direction:
1) The free version of Web3Q will be gradually made into a “Lite” version.
The crowd positioning of this version, simply put, is “Web3 Beginners” (such as: Internet people who want to transform from Web2 to Web3, practitioners in other fields who are waiting for the opportunity to enter the market, initially immersed in the Web3 circle but have not yet formed their own complete information network and research methodology friends). Among the current incremental readers, 85% should be such friends.
Therefore, the Lite version will reduce the “hard core” content that requires prior knowledge, such as over-technical infrastructure, over-professional institutional investment trends, etc., and instead focus on popular science, tools, tutorials, and concise and comprehensive viewpoints. Appropriately increase (I personally reject, but the demand is very strong) airdrops, prize giving activities, whitelist grabbing, online voice, etc.
For compliance, the Lite version will also exclude content such as cryptocurrency investment strategies/tools, and use words that are not easily accessible to regulatory sensitive points as much as possible, such as “NFT” -> “Digital Collection”.
2) As an upgraded version of the Lite version, I am planning a more advanced Pro version.
The Pro version will provide in-depth professional content that the Lite version has cut, plus more sources, real-time warnings, and more analysis tools (such as market sentiment based on on-chain data and prices, etc.). It is still under planning, but the underlying architecture has already been set up, and the AI is continuing to train.
I hope to find investment institutions, DAOs and other organizations with real needs to research and polish real needs, and then productize them. It is not my imagination.
By the way, the English world version will also be placed in this Pro version.
3) I wrote a scoring weighting module based on source quality yesterday.
This means that in the future, Web3Q will not only be able to identify pros and cons based on “content”, but will also include “the person who posted this content” into the evaluation indicators.
My source score weighting module is not dead, it is dynamic, it will be updated daily, and there are algorithms based on a series of dynamic indicators of the source. From today onwards, the final screening results you see are all added with source weighting.
In order to make good use of this module, I will continue to expand more sources. And, in due course, an expansion pack of “professional sources in different verticals” may be launched.
You will be able to choose the vertical field you are most interested in to subscribe (for example, I want to know about 20 KOLs that focus on on-chain data analysis, and I can use it to comprehensively predict the trend of tomorrow).
Web3Q